This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: Deprecating basic asm in a function - What now?


On Mon, Jul 4, 2016 at 12:09 PM, Frank Ch. Eigler <fche@redhat.com> wrote:
> jwakely.gcc wrote:
>
>> [...] (When we switched Fedora to using GCC 6, with C++14 enabled by
>> default, dozens and dozens of C++ packages failed to compile,
>> because even in 2016 nobody had ever tried to compile them with
>> C++11 features enabled.)
>
> And one shouldn't blame those that choose to stick with CXXFLAGS=-std=c++98
> instead of porting their code, which after all is working & stable.

Absolutely, that's a fine solution.  Though often it makes sense to
put the -std argument in the CXX variable rather than CXXFLAGS.

Jason


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]