This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: Deprecating basic asm in a function - What now?


On 21/06/16 17:43, Jeff Law wrote:

> I think there's enough resistance to deprecating basic asms within a
> function that we should probably punt that idea.
> 
> I do think we should look to stomp out our own uses of basic asms
> within functions just from a long term maintenance standpoint.
> 
> Finally I think we should continue to bring the implementation of
> basic asms more in-line with expectations and future proofing them
> since I'm having a hard time seeing a reasonable path to deprecating
> their use.

Me too.  I wonder if there's anything else we can do to make basic asm
in a function a bit less of a time bomb.

Andrew.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]