This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: Please block seurer at linux dot vnet dot ibm dot com from gcc-regression
- From: Bill Seurer <seurer at linux dot vnet dot ibm dot com>
- To: Joseph Myers <joseph at codesourcery dot com>
- Cc: pthaugen at us dot ibm dot com, wschmidt at us dot ibm dot com, gcc-regression at gcc dot gnu dot org, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org, overseers at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Tue, 19 Apr 2016 08:22:53 -0500
- Subject: Re: Please block seurer at linux dot vnet dot ibm dot com from gcc-regression
- Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
- References: <alpine dot DEB dot 2 dot 10 dot 1604190953330 dot 31861 at digraph dot polyomino dot org dot uk>
On 04/19/16 04:56, Joseph Myers wrote:
In the past few days, email@example.com has sent half a gigabyte
of huge messages such as
gcc-regression, those messages containing no actual useful information
about regressions caused by GCC commits. Overseers, could you block that
address from posting to gcc-regression until we have confirmation that the
process sending those messages to gcc-regression has stopped and will not
be restarted and that there are no more such messages waiting in a mail
queue somewhere (all the messages seem to be dated Sunday, but they are
still coming through)?
I apologize about that. I activated gcc 6 on our tester Sunday but
failed to prime the source first. That caused the tester scripts to
loop trying to get the source and failing.
I updated the scripts yesterday to prevent this from happening in the