gcc archive
date index for April, 2016

This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Indexes: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Site Nav: [Browse other archives for this mailing list]
[Browse other mailing lists at this site]
Search: Limit to:

April 29, 2016
17:54 Re: Re: (R5900) Implementing Vector Support Liu Woon Yung
15:09 Gain in size and win your girl's addiction roslaw . medon
11:34 Re: Canonical forms of edges and fallthroughs Steven Bosscher
10:52 Canonical forms of edges and fallthroughs Kyrill Tkachov

April 28, 2016
22:36 gcc-6-20160428 is now available gccadmin
22:04 Re: relying on static_assert to test constexpr changes Martin Sebor
21:54 Re: relying on static_assert to test constexpr changes Andrew Pinski
21:49 relying on static_assert to test constexpr changes Martin Sebor
19:23 Re: Bug maintenance Andrew Pinski
16:42 Re: Bug maintenance Martin Sebor
12:22 Re: [RFC6 PATCH v6 00/21] ILP32 for ARM64 - LTP results Zhangjian (Bamvor)
09:01 Re: Bug maintenance Richard Biener
07:35 Bug maintenance David Wohlferd
04:25 How to avoid instrumenting function in a particular section? Vanush Vaswani

April 27, 2016
22:46 Re: SafeStack proposal in GCC Jeff Law
22:36 gcc-4.9-20160427 is now available gccadmin
21:15 Re: [RFC6 PATCH v6 00/21] ILP32 for ARM64 - LTP results Andrew Pinski
16:15 Re: Question on TARGET_MMX and X86_TUNE_GENERAL_REGS_SSE_SPILL Uros Bizjak
14:39 Re: Question on TARGET_MMX and X86_TUNE_GENERAL_REGS_SSE_SPILL Uros Bizjak
14:26 Re: Question on TARGET_MMX and X86_TUNE_GENERAL_REGS_SSE_SPILL Ilya Enkovich
14:23 Re: Where to find global var declaration Cristina Georgiana Opriceana
14:06 RE: Question on TARGET_MMX and X86_TUNE_GENERAL_REGS_SSE_SPILL Kumar, Venkataramanan
13:54 Re: Where to find global var declaration David Malcolm
13:03 Update gcc 7.0.0 status on main page? Martin Reinecke
12:05 Re: Question on TARGET_MMX and X86_TUNE_GENERAL_REGS_SSE_SPILL Ilya Enkovich
11:46 GCC 6.1.1 Status Report (2015-05-27) Jakub Jelinek
11:39 GCC 6.1 Released Jakub Jelinek
11:35 RE: Question on TARGET_MMX and X86_TUNE_GENERAL_REGS_SSE_SPILL Kumar, Venkataramanan
09:34 Where to find global var declaration Cristina Georgiana Opriceana
07:30 Re: [RFC6 PATCH v6 00/21] ILP32 for ARM64 - LTP results Andrew Pinski

April 26, 2016
22:36 gcc-5-20160426 is now available gccadmin
13:39 Re: Question on TARGET_MMX and X86_TUNE_GENERAL_REGS_SSE_SPILL Ilya Enkovich
08:13 Re: Preventing preemption of 'protected' symbols in GNU ld 2.26 [aka should we revert the fix for 65248] Jakub Jelinek
05:55 Re: Preventing preemption of 'protected' symbols in GNU ld 2.26 [aka should we revert the fix for 65248] Alan Modra

April 25, 2016
17:35 Re: Preventing preemption of 'protected' symbols in GNU ld 2.26 [aka should we revert the fix for 65248] Jeff Law
17:31 Re: Preventing preemption of 'protected' symbols in GNU ld 2.26 [aka should we revert the fix for 65248] H.J. Lu
17:24 Re: Preventing preemption of 'protected' symbols in GNU ld 2.26 [aka should we revert the fix for 65248] Jeff Law
17:04 Re: Is MODES_TIEABLE_P transitive? Jeff Law
13:25 Re: internal_reference_types Richard Kenner
13:18 Re: internal_reference_types Eric Botcazou
13:04 Re: internal_reference_types Richard Kenner
13:02 Re: internal_reference_types Eric Botcazou
12:23 Re: internal_reference_types Richard Kenner
10:24 Re: internal_reference_types Richard Biener
10:19 Re: internal_reference_types Eric Botcazou
10:01 Re: internal_reference_types Richard Biener
06:11 Re: std::list iteration performance for under 1000 elements Florian Weimer

April 24, 2016
22:52 std::list iteration performance for under 1000 elements Soul Studios
22:36 gcc-7-20160424 is now available gccadmin
18:47 GSoC projects are announced Prasad Ghangal

April 23, 2016
17:17 Re: Second GCC 6.1 Release Candidate available from gcc.gnu.org Jakub Jelinek
17:15 Re: Second GCC 6.1 Release Candidate available from gcc.gnu.org Jack Howarth
15:20 Second GCC 6.1 Release Candidate available from gcc.gnu.org Jakub Jelinek
11:23 Re: internal_reference_types Eric Botcazou
08:32 Re: split_live_ranges_for_shrink_wrap and !SHRINK_WRAPPING_ENABLED? Denis Chertykov
03:42 Re: [RFC6 PATCH v6 00/21] ILP32 for ARM64 - LTP results Zhangjian (Bamvor)

April 22, 2016
21:21 Re: Segher Boessenkool appointed PowerPC maintainer Segher Boessenkool
20:41 Segher Boessenkool appointed PowerPC maintainer David Edelsohn
18:19 internal_reference_types Andreas Schwab
17:34 GCC Coding Conventions typo Chris Gregory
15:06 Re: GCC 6 symbol poisoning and c++ header usage is fragile Martin Sebor

April 21, 2016
22:51 Re: Looking for some help with GCC 6 and bad code generation Zan Lynx
22:36 gcc-6-20160421 is now available gccadmin
21:45 Re: Does gcc cilk plus support include offloading to graphics hardware? Hal Ashburner
19:54 Is MODES_TIEABLE_P transitive? Michael Meissner
19:31 Re: Does gcc cilk plus support include offloading to graphics hardware? Ilya Verbin
17:04 Re: GCC 6 symbol poisoning and c++ header usage is fragile Jonathan Wakely
16:55 Re: GCC 6 symbol poisoning and c++ header usage is fragile Jason Merrill
15:58 Re: GCC 6 symbol poisoning and c++ header usage is fragile Jonathan Wakely
14:32 Re: GCC 6 symbol poisoning and c++ header usage is fragile Joel Sherrill
13:20 Re: GCC 6 symbol poisoning and c++ header usage is fragile Jonathan Wakely
13:04 Re: Re: Why does gcc generate const local array on stack? Bingfeng Mei
13:00 Re: GCC 6 symbol poisoning and c++ header usage is fragile David Edelsohn
12:53 Re: GCC 6 symbol poisoning and c++ header usage is fragile Michael Matz
12:34 Re: GCC 6 symbol poisoning and c++ header usage is fragile Szabolcs Nagy
11:52 Re: GCC 6 symbol poisoning and c++ header usage is fragile Jonathan Wakely
11:48 Re: GCC 6 symbol poisoning and c++ header usage is fragile Szabolcs Nagy
11:36 Re: GCC 6 symbol poisoning and c++ header usage is fragile Richard Biener
11:12 GCC 6 symbol poisoning and c++ header usage is fragile Szabolcs Nagy
10:15 Re: Re: Why does gcc generate const local array on stack? Richard Biener
09:43 Re: Looking for some help with GCC 6 and bad code generation Jonathan Wakely
09:39 Re: Re: Why does gcc generate const local array on stack? Jonathan Wakely
09:07 Re: Re: Why does gcc generate const local array on stack? Bingfeng Mei
04:10 Re: Does gcc cilk plus support include offloading to graphics hardware? Hal Ashburner
02:43 Re: Re: Why does gcc generate const local array on stack? lh_mouse
01:37 Re: Looking for some help with GCC 6 and bad code generation Zan Lynx
01:18 Re: Looking for some help with GCC 6 and bad code generation Andrew Pinski
01:11 Looking for some help with GCC 6 and bad code generation Zan Lynx

April 20, 2016
23:24 Re: Does gcc cilk plus support include offloading to graphics hardware? Hal Ashburner
22:35 gcc-4.9-20160420 is now available gccadmin
17:51 Re: Why does gcc generate const local array on stack? Jonathan Wakely
17:45 Re: Preventing preemption of 'protected' symbols in GNU ld 2.26 [aka should we revert the fix for 65248] anonymous
17:31 Re: Why does gcc generate const local array on stack? lh_mouse
16:10 Re: SafeStack proposal in GCC Volodymyr Kuznetsov
15:38 Why does gcc generate const local array on stack? Bingfeng Mei
14:54 Re: SafeStack proposal in GCC Szabolcs Nagy
12:53 Re: SafeStack proposal in GCC Joseph Myers
07:16 Re: Re: Re: Adding a new thread model to GCC lh_mouse
01:01 Does gcc cilk plus support include offloading to graphics hardware? Hal Ashburner

April 19, 2016
22:36 gcc-5-20160419 is now available gccadmin
22:15 Re: Please block seurer at linux dot vnet dot ibm dot com from gcc-regression Christopher Faylor
21:03 Re: Preventing preemption of 'protected' symbols in GNU ld 2.26 [aka should we revert the fix for 65248] Cary Coutant
20:18 Re: Preventing preemption of 'protected' symbols in GNU ld 2.26 [aka should we revert the fix for 65248] Rich Felker
19:11 Re: Preventing preemption of 'protected' symbols in GNU ld 2.26 [aka should we revert the fix for 65248] H.J. Lu
16:31 Re: Please block seurer at linux dot vnet dot ibm dot com from gcc-regression Joseph Myers
16:00 Re: Preventing preemption of 'protected' symbols in GNU ld 2.26 [aka should we revert the fix for 65248] H.J. Lu
15:58 Re: Preventing preemption of 'protected' symbols in GNU ld 2.26 [aka should we revert the fix for 65248] Cary Coutant
15:54 Re: Preventing preemption of 'protected' symbols in GNU ld 2.26 [aka should we revert the fix for 65248] Cary Coutant
15:54 Re: Preventing preemption of 'protected' symbols in GNU ld 2.26 [aka should we revert the fix for 65248] H.J. Lu
15:52 Re: Preventing preemption of 'protected' symbols in GNU ld 2.26 [aka should we revert the fix for 65248] H.J. Lu
15:46 Re: Preventing preemption of 'protected' symbols in GNU ld 2.26 [aka should we revert the fix for 65248] Alan Modra
15:44 Re: Preventing preemption of 'protected' symbols in GNU ld 2.26 [aka should we revert the fix for 65248] H.J. Lu
15:37 Re: Preventing preemption of 'protected' symbols in GNU ld 2.26 [aka should we revert the fix for 65248] Cary Coutant
14:06 Re: Preventing preemption of 'protected' symbols in GNU ld 2.26 [aka should we revert the fix for 65248] Michael Matz
13:23 Re: Please block seurer at linux dot vnet dot ibm dot com from gcc-regression Bill Seurer
09:57 Please block seurer at linux dot vnet dot ibm dot com from gcc-regression Joseph Myers
09:53 Re: Preventing preemption of 'protected' symbols in GNU ld 2.26 [aka should we revert the fix for 65248] Szabolcs Nagy
09:20 Re: libatomic on ARM Sebastian Huber
08:52 libatomic on ARM Sebastian Huber
08:26 Re: Re: Re: Adding a new thread model to GCC lh_mouse
08:20 Re: Preventing preemption of 'protected' symbols in GNU ld 2.26 [aka should we revert the fix for 65248] Richard Biener
05:08 Re: Preventing preemption of 'protected' symbols in GNU ld 2.26 [aka should we revert the fix for 65248] Alan Modra

April 18, 2016
22:47 Re: Undefined C++ Atomic Symbol on sh-rtems Oleg Endo
19:28 Re: Preventing preemption of 'protected' symbols in GNU ld 2.26 [aka should we revert the fix for 65248] H.J. Lu
19:16 Re: Undefined C++ Atomic Symbol on sh-rtems Joel Sherrill
18:52 Re: Preventing preemption of 'protected' symbols in GNU ld 2.26 [aka should we revert the fix for 65248] Jakub Jelinek
18:52 Motorcycle Owners List Kathy Fegan
17:57 Re: Preventing preemption of 'protected' symbols in GNU ld 2.26 [aka should we revert the fix for 65248] Maciej W. Rozycki
17:55 Re: Preventing preemption of 'protected' symbols in GNU ld 2.26 [aka should we revert the fix for 65248] Cary Coutant
17:27 Re: Preventing preemption of 'protected' symbols in GNU ld 2.26 [aka should we revert the fix for 65248] H.J. Lu
17:24 Re: Preventing preemption of 'protected' symbols in GNU ld 2.26 [aka should we revert the fix for 65248] Michael Matz
17:09 Re: Preventing preemption of 'protected' symbols in GNU ld 2.26 [aka should we revert the fix for 65248] H.J. Lu
17:05 Re: Preventing preemption of 'protected' symbols in GNU ld 2.26 [aka should we revert the fix for 65248] Cary Coutant
17:04 Re: Preventing preemption of 'protected' symbols in GNU ld 2.26 [aka should we revert the fix for 65248] Maciej W. Rozycki
14:59 Re: Preventing preemption of 'protected' symbols in GNU ld 2.26 [aka should we revert the fix for 65248] H.J. Lu
14:49 Re: Preventing preemption of 'protected' symbols in GNU ld 2.26 [aka should we revert the fix for 65248] Alan Modra
13:25 Re: Vector registers on MIPS arch David Guillen
11:11 Re: Undefined C++ Atomic Symbol on sh-rtems Oleg Endo
10:05 Re: Re: Re: Adding a new thread model to GCC lh_mouse
09:59 Re: Re: Re: Adding a new thread model to GCC Jonathan Wakely
09:57 Re: Re: Re: Adding a new thread model to GCC Jonathan Wakely
09:33 Re: Vector registers on MIPS arch Richard Biener
09:18 Re: Re: Re: Adding a new thread model to GCC lh_mouse
09:02 Re: Re: Re: Adding a new thread model to GCC lh_mouse
09:01 Re: Preventing preemption of 'protected' symbols in GNU ld 2.26 [aka should we revert the fix for 65248] Richard Biener
08:59 Re: Re: Adding a new thread model to GCC Jonathan Wakely
08:59 Re: Re: Adding a new thread model to GCC Jonathan Wakely
08:53 split_live_ranges_for_shrink_wrap and !SHRINK_WRAPPING_ENABLED? Senthil Kumar Selvaraj
08:17 Re: guide me Andrew Haley
07:39 Re: Re: Adding a new thread model to GCC lh_mouse

April 17, 2016
22:35 gcc-7-20160417 is now available gccadmin
22:10 Re: Getting format of arg_type Manuel LÃpez-IbÃÃez
21:34 Re: m68k / coldfire target Jeff Law
20:20 m68k / coldfire target Angelo Dureghello
18:34 Re: Undefined C++ Atomic Symbol on sh-rtems Joel Sherrill
16:58 guide me J a h a n z e b F a h i m
16:56 Re: Re: Adding a new thread model to GCC lh_mouse
00:50 Re: Undefined C++ Atomic Symbol on sh-rtems Oleg Endo

April 16, 2016
23:59 Undefined C++ Atomic Symbol on sh-rtems Joel Sherrill

April 15, 2016
21:56 Re: Preventing preemption of 'protected' symbols in GNU ld 2.26 [aka should we revert the fix for 65248] H.J. Lu
21:49 Re: Preventing preemption of 'protected' symbols in GNU ld 2.26 [aka should we revert the fix for 65248] Jeff Law
18:21 GCC 6.1 Release Candidate available from gcc.gnu.org Jakub Jelinek
16:30 Re: Problems installing GCC Jonathan Wakely
16:27 Problems installing GCC Hassan Haddouchi
15:44 GCC 7.0.0 Status Report (2016-04-15) Jakub Jelinek
15:20 Re: GCC 6.0.1 Status Report (2016-04-15) H.J. Lu
15:12 Re: GCC 6.0.1 Status Report (2016-04-15) Jeff Law
15:10 GCC 6.0.1 Status Report (2016-04-15) Jakub Jelinek
13:35 Getting format of arg_type Prasad Ghangal
11:46 Re: How to check if two symbols are from same source unit during WPA ? Jan Hubicka

April 14, 2016
17:15 Re: [IMPORTANT] slots assigned Jeff Law
12:59 Re: Re: Adding a new thread model to GCC Torvald Riegel
12:29 Re: How to check if two symbols are from same source unit during WPA ? Richard Biener
12:28 Re: [IMPORTANT] slots assigned Giuseppe Scrivano
12:22 Re: How to check if two symbols are from same source unit during WPA ? Ramana Radhakrishnan
12:16 Re: How to check if two symbols are from same source unit during WPA ? Richard Biener
12:08 Re: How to check if two symbols are from same source unit during WPA ? Prathamesh Kulkarni
11:12 Re: [IMPORTANT] slots assigned Richard Biener
08:26 Re: How to check if two symbols are from same source unit during WPA ? Richard Biener
05:40 Question on TARGET_MMX and X86_TUNE_GENERAL_REGS_SSE_SPILL Kumar, Venkataramanan
04:15 Re: How to check if two symbols are from same source unit during WPA ? Prathamesh Kulkarni
03:32 Re: Re: Re: Adding a new thread model to GCC lh_mouse
03:03 Re: Re: Adding a new thread model to GCC Dongsheng Song
02:25 Re: Re: Adding a new thread model to GCC lh_mouse

April 13, 2016
22:36 gcc-4.9-20160413 is now available gccadmin
17:41 Re: Adding a new thread model to GCC Torvald Riegel
17:39 Re: Unnecessary check on phi node in tree if-conversion? Jeff Law
13:01 SafeStack proposal in GCC Cristina Georgiana Opriceana
11:10 Re: Re: Adding a new thread model to GCC lh_mouse
10:30 Re: Adding a new thread model to GCC Jonathan Wakely
09:18 Adding a new thread model to GCC lh_mouse
06:54 RE: Building gcc with graphite Kumar, Venkataramanan

April 12, 2016
22:36 gcc-5-20160412 is now available gccadmin
17:12 Re: How to check if two symbols are from same source unit during WPA ? Richard Biener
15:50 Re: Some aliasing questions Richard Biener
15:11 Re: Some aliasing questions Richard Henderson
13:47 How to check if two symbols are from same source unit during WPA ? Prathamesh Kulkarni
13:03 Re: Some aliasing questions Bill Schmidt
09:39 Re: Building gcc with graphite Tom de Vries
00:30 Re: Some aliasing questions Alan Modra

April 11, 2016
17:13 ERP users list Amanda Jackson
16:22 check for the existence of "__sync_lock_test_and_set" Dennis Luehring
11:55 Re: Vector registers on MIPS arch Ilya Enkovich

April 10, 2016
22:36 gcc-6-20160410 is now available gccadmin
19:56 Re: Split-stack support for aarch64 Ian Lance Taylor
07:43 Re: Minor documentation typo Andreas Schwab
00:49 Minor documentation typo NightStrike
00:34 Re: Vector registers on MIPS arch David Guillen Fandos

April 08, 2016
21:41 Re: Some aliasing questions Bill Schmidt
20:41 Re: Some aliasing questions Richard Henderson
19:24 Re: Unnecessary check on phi node in tree if-conversion? Richard Biener
19:21 Re: Some aliasing questions Richard Biener
18:10 Some aliasing questions Bill Schmidt
14:56 Re: Unnecessary check on phi node in tree if-conversion? Bin.Cheng
12:16 Re: Q: (d = NAN) != NAN? Jonathan Wakely
10:12 Re: Q: (d = NAN) != NAN? Szabolcs Nagy
10:09 Q: (d = NAN) != NAN? Ulrich Windl

April 07, 2016
09:30 Re: Unnecessary check on phi node in tree if-conversion? Richard Biener
08:10 Re: Vector registers on MIPS arch Ilya Enkovich

April 06, 2016
22:36 gcc-4.9-20160406 is now available gccadmin
21:49 Re: Vector registers on MIPS arch David Guillen Fandos
18:21 Re: Unnecessary check on phi node in tree if-conversion? Bin.Cheng
16:07 Unnecessary check on phi node in tree if-conversion? Bin.Cheng
09:44 Re: Vector registers on MIPS arch Ilya Enkovich

April 05, 2016
22:51 Re: Vector registers on MIPS arch David Guillen Fandos
22:36 gcc-5-20160405 is now available gccadmin
15:29 Re: Change the arrch64 abi ...(Custom /Specific change) Jim Wilson
15:22 Re: Compute all gimple statements in which a var is used Richard Biener
15:20 RE: [RFC] When adding an offset to a lo_sum containing a symbol, check it is in range of the symbol's alignment Andrew Bennett
15:03 Re: Compute all gimple statements in which a var is used Jeff Law
14:59 Re: Compute all gimple statements in which a var is used Cristina Georgiana Opriceana
09:45 Re: Change the arrch64 abi ...(Custom /Specific change) Umesh Kalappa
08:13 Re: Vector registers on MIPS arch Ilya Enkovich
00:04 Re: IF conversion bug with CC0 Dan

April 04, 2016
23:31 Re: Change the arrch64 abi ...(Custom /Specific change) Jim Wilson
23:24 Re: IF conversion bug with CC0 Eric Botcazou
22:59 Re: Vector registers on MIPS arch David Guillen Fandos
22:49 Re: IF conversion bug with CC0 Dan
22:32 Re: IF conversion bug with CC0 Jeff Law
22:20 Re: IF conversion bug with CC0 Eric Botcazou
21:26 Re: IF conversion bug with CC0 Jeff Law
21:22 Re: IF conversion bug with CC0 Dan
20:43 Re: [RFC] When adding an offset to a lo_sum containing a symbol, check it is in range of the symbol's alignment Jeff Law
20:42 Re: IF conversion bug with CC0 Jeff Law
20:19 IF conversion bug with CC0 Dan
17:53 Re: (R5900) Implementing Vector Support Richard Henderson
16:42 Re: [RFC] When adding an offset to a lo_sum containing a symbol, check it is in range of the symbol's alignment Richard Henderson
15:55 Change the arrch64 abi ...(Custom /Specific change) Umesh Kalappa
13:52 Split-stack support for aarch64 Adhemerval Zanella
12:37 [RFC] When adding an offset to a lo_sum containing a symbol, check it is in range of the symbol's alignment Andrew Bennett
09:55 Re: Vector registers on MIPS arch Ilya Enkovich
04:12 (R5900) Implementing Vector Support Woon yung Liu

April 03, 2016
22:36 gcc-6-20160403 is now available gccadmin
22:24 Re: Need suggestion about bug 68425 Manuel LÃpez-IbÃÃez
15:56 Re: Need suggestion about bug 68425 Prasad Ghangal
01:26 Re: (MIPS R5900) Adding support for the FPU (COP1) instructions Woon yung Liu
00:53 Re: Leaking bitmap data in ree.c? Trevor Saunders
00:45 Re: Leaking bitmap data in ree.c? Trevor Saunders

April 02, 2016
03:34 Re: How to identify the version of the LLVM AddressSanitizer integrated to GCC 4.9.3 and after Yuri Gribov
00:33 Vector registers on MIPS arch David Guillen Fandos

April 01, 2016
16:08 Re: Run one gcc test case multiple times with different option sets Andrew Pinski
16:06 Re: Run one gcc test case multiple times with different option sets Bill Seurer
15:48 Re: Run one gcc test case multiple times with different option sets Andrew Pinski
15:42 Run one gcc test case multiple times with different option sets Bill Seurer
14:35 Re: Should a disabled warning be allowed to be promoted to an error(Bugzilla PR 70275)? Jeff Law
14:33 Re: Re: stray quotation marks warning enhancement or extension Manuel LÃpez-IbÃÃez
14:20 Re: Should a disabled warning be allowed to be promoted to an error(Bugzilla PR 70275)? Manuel LÃpez-IbÃÃez
13:44 Re: (MIPS R5900) Adding support for the FPU (COP1) instructions Woon yung Liu
10:14 Re: How to identify the version of the LLVM AddressSanitizer integrated to GCC 4.9.3 and after Martin LiÅka
04:31 Re: How to identify the version of the LLVM AddressSanitizer integrated to GCC 4.9.3 and after Gayan Pathirage
03:39 Re: Should a disabled warning be allowed to be promoted to an error(Bugzilla PR 70275)? Martin Sebor


Indexes: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Site Nav: [Browse other archives for this mailing list]
[Browse other mailing lists at this site]
Search: Limit to:

Mail converted by MHonArc