This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: gengtype: conditional GTY ? (to add before GCC 6 release)
- From: Richard Biener <richard dot guenther at gmail dot com>
- To: Michael Matz <matz at suse dot de>
- Cc: Mikhail Maltsev <maltsevm at gmail dot com>,GCC Development <gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- Date: Mon, 15 Feb 2016 19:04:19 +0100
- Subject: Re: gengtype: conditional GTY ? (to add before GCC 6 release)
- Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
- References: <56BDCECE dot 60407 at starynkevitch dot net> <CAFiYyc2kT8H3NhRJEhSWfA+iGt8Ueq84=P8y8yX3pO7Q0nrrvg at mail dot gmail dot com> <56BDF265 dot 4070405 at gmail dot com> <DC829F7F-7881-44EA-9645-2DD70355CD72 at gmail dot com> <alpine dot LSU dot 2 dot 20 dot 1602151633400 dot 20277 at wotan dot suse dot de>
On February 15, 2016 4:34:48 PM GMT+01:00, Michael Matz <email@example.com> wrote:
>On Fri, 12 Feb 2016, Richard Biener wrote:
>> >What do you think about refactoring iterators in GCC 7?
>> I think refactoring towards STL style iterators would be welcome. It
>> may be different for the actual instances though.
>Oh God, please, for the live of all kittens, no. If anything,
>and use a range idiom like in D.
OK, so my point is we want to have consistency. With somebody having invented gsi_* poorly matching STL style
either that has to be refactored as well
Or we work towards that style, possibly fixing it at first. Gsi_* is used a _lot_ and in non-obvious ways.