This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: Help about how to bootstrap gcc with local version glibc other than system one
- From: "Bin.Cheng" <amker dot cheng at gmail dot com>
- To: Andreas Schwab <schwab at linux-m68k dot org>
- Cc: "gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- Date: Mon, 1 Feb 2016 19:07:18 +0000
- Subject: Re: Help about how to bootstrap gcc with local version glibc other than system one
- Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
- References: <CAHFci2-MGvGREn85cu91U_KT0bqsgMuCWsfON42u5ENJaiaH4w at mail dot gmail dot com> <87egcwxpzi dot fsf at linux-m68k dot org>
On Mon, Feb 1, 2016 at 6:08 PM, Andreas Schwab <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> "Bin.Cheng" <email@example.com> writes:
>> Seems to me Andrew was right in comment of PR69559, that we simply
>> couldn't bootstrap GCC with sysroot.
> The main use of sysroot is to build a cross compiler, which you cannot
> bootstrap anyway.
>> My question here is: If this is the case, how should I bootstrap a gcc
>> against local version glibc, rather than the system one? Is chroot
>> the only way to do that?
> Yes, building in a chroot or a VM is the best way to do it. For
> example, that's how the openSUSE Build Service works.
Thanks very much for helping. I will try to do it in chroot.
> Andreas Schwab, firstname.lastname@example.org
> GPG Key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756 01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5
> "And now for something completely different."