This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.
Indexes: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] Site Nav: [Browse other archives for this mailing list]
[Browse other mailing lists at this site]
January 31, 2016
22:36 | Re: [RFC PR43721] Optimize a/b and a%b to single divmod call | Richard Henderson |
22:36 | gcc-6-20160131 is now available | gccadmin |
January 30, 2016
10:42 | Re: RFC: Support non-standard extension (call via casted function pointer) | Andreas Schwab |
10:37 | Re: RFC: Support non-standard extension (call via casted function pointer) | Eric Botcazou |
10:33 | Re: RFC: Support non-standard extension (call via casted function pointer) | Andreas Schwab |
10:20 | Re: RFC: Support non-standard extension (call via casted function pointer) | Eric Botcazou |
09:32 | Re: RFC: Support non-standard extension (call via casted function pointer) | Andreas Schwab |
04:16 | Re: RFC: Support non-standard extension (call via casted function pointer) | Jeff Law |
04:13 | Re: RFC: Support non-standard extension (call via casted function pointer) | Jeff Law |
January 29, 2016
23:55 | Re: void* vs void * | Jonathan Wakely |
19:30 | Re: void* vs void * | Marek Polacek |
18:13 | void* vs void * | Magnus Fromreide |
14:00 | Re: libstdc++ and c library compatible issue when bootstrap GCC | Jonathan Wakely |
10:28 | ld fails to build proper executables in several cases on x64_64-w64-mingw32 | Rainer Emrich |
08:09 | Re: [RFC PR43721] Optimize a/b and a%b to single divmod call | Richard Biener |
03:50 | Re: [RFC PR43721] Optimize a/b and a%b to single divmod call | Jim Wilson |
January 28, 2016
January 27, 2016
January 26, 2016
January 25, 2016
22:07 | Re: RFC: Support non-standard extension (call via casted function pointer) | Andreas Schwab |
22:01 | RE: [RFC] DW_OP_piece vs. DW_OP_bit_piece on a Register | Matthew Fortune |
21:55 | Re: Help! Regarding Bug 17896 | Manuel LÃpez-IbÃÃez |
21:47 | RFC: Support non-standard extension (call via casted function pointer) | Michael Karcher |
21:06 | Re: Help! Regarding Bug 17896 | Prathamesh Kulkarni |
20:17 | Re: Help! Regarding Bug 17896 | Mikhail Maltsev |
20:06 | Re: Question about how to fix PR69052 | Bernd Schmidt |
19:51 | Re: Question about how to fix PR69052 | Jeff Law |
19:15 | Help! Regarding Bug 17896 | Prasad Ghangal |
18:42 | Question about how to fix PR69052 | Bin.Cheng |
00:03 | Re: C/C++ standards supported by the preprocessor | Gerald Pfeifer |
January 24, 2016
22:36 | gcc-6-20160124 is now available | gccadmin |
15:23 | Re: Hi! New to GCC | Mikhail Maltsev |
January 22, 2016
19:42 | Re: Status of GCC 6 on x86_64 (Debian) | Markus Trippelsdorf |
19:27 | Re: Status of GCC 6 on x86_64 (Debian) | Martin Michlmayr |
14:42 | RFA: Add GCC Runtime Library Exception to include/plugin-api.h | H.J. Lu |
07:27 | Re: Status of GCC 6 on x86_64 (Debian) | Matthias Klose |
05:09 | Status of GCC 6 on x86_64 (Debian) | Martin Michlmayr |
January 21, 2016
18:04 | Need forms for contribution towards gcc | Shiv Shankar Dayal |
14:22 | Re: Implementing TI mode (128-bit) and the 2nd pipeline for the MIPS R5900 | Woon yung Liu |
11:41 | Re: Source Code for Profile Guided Code Positioning | Maxim Ostapenko |
11:32 | Re: SH runtime switchable atomics - proposed design | Oleg Endo |
11:22 | Re: SH runtime switchable atomics - proposed design | Torvald Riegel |
06:06 | Re: Hi! New to GCC | Prasad Ghangal |
01:22 | Re: SH runtime switchable atomics - proposed design | Rich Felker |
January 20, 2016
23:08 | Re: SH runtime switchable atomics - proposed design | Oleg Endo |
22:36 | gcc-4.9-20160120 is now available | gccadmin |
13:39 | Re: Source Code for Profile Guided Code Positioning | Ian Lance Taylor |
10:12 | Re: Instruction scheduling for the R5900's 2 integer pipelines | Woon yung Liu |
08:27 | GCC 6 Status Report (2016-01-20), Stage 3 ended | Richard Biener |
07:08 | Re: Source Code for Profile Guided Code Positioning | Sriraman Tallam |
January 19, 2016
January 18, 2016
18:37 | Re: x86 interrupt attribute | H.J. Lu |
18:28 | Re: x86 interrupt attribute | Wink Saville |
17:47 | Re: x86 interrupt attribute | H.J. Lu |
17:39 | x86 interrupt attribute | Wink Saville |
17:10 | Re: ipa vrp implementation in gcc | Jan Hubicka |
17:07 | Re: distro test rebuild using GCC 6 | James Greenhalgh |
16:00 | Re: [RFC] DW_OP_piece vs. DW_OP_bit_piece on a Register | Andreas Arnez |
14:06 | Re: help with PR69133 | Jan Hubicka |
09:42 | Re: ipa vrp implementation in gcc | Richard Biener |
09:33 | Re: help with PR69133 | Richard Biener |
09:28 | Re: help with PR69133 | Prathamesh Kulkarni |
09:27 | Re: [RFC][AArch64] function prologue analyzer in linux kernel | AKASHI Takahiro |
06:15 | Re: ipa vrp implementation in gcc | vivek pandya |
06:05 | Re: ipa vrp implementation in gcc | vivek pandya |
02:31 | C/C++ standards supported by the preprocessor | Sandra Loosemore |
January 17, 2016
23:01 | Re: ipa vrp implementation in gcc | Kugan |
22:46 | Re: ipa vrp implementation in gcc | Kugan |
22:36 | gcc-6-20160117 is now available | gccadmin |
09:26 | help with PR69133 | Prathamesh Kulkarni |
January 16, 2016
13:27 | Re: [RFC] DW_OP_piece vs. DW_OP_bit_piece on a Register | Joel Brobecker |
10:29 | i370 - strange padding being generated for literals | Paul Edwards |
January 15, 2016
January 14, 2016
23:47 | Reorder/combine insns on superscalar arch | Igor Shevlyakov |
17:47 | Re: Remove sel-sched? | Bernd Schmidt |
17:26 | Re: Remove sel-sched? | Jeff Law |
17:20 | Re: RTL CSE picking simpler but more expensive expressions (re: PR 65932) | Jeff Law |
17:15 | Re: distro test rebuild using GCC 6 | James Greenhalgh |
16:34 | [RFC] DW_OP_piece vs. DW_OP_bit_piece on a Register | Andreas Arnez |
10:20 | i370 - block move needs 16 MiB limit | Paul Edwards |
10:15 | Re: RTL CSE picking simpler but more expensive expressions (re: PR 65932) | Kyrill Tkachov |
07:08 | Re: Remove sel-sched? | Andrey Belevantsev |
January 13, 2016
22:35 | gcc-4.9-20160113 is now available | gccadmin |
19:28 | Re: RTL CSE picking simpler but more expensive expressions (re: PR 65932) | Jeff Law |
18:25 | Remove sel-sched? | Bernd Schmidt |
15:56 | Re: distro test rebuild using GCC 6 | Jeff Law |
13:17 | distro test rebuild using GCC 6 | Matthias Klose |
11:33 | RTL CSE picking simpler but more expensive expressions (re: PR 65932) | Kyrill Tkachov |
09:06 | Re: vectorization ICE for aarch64/armhf on SPEC2006 h264ref | Andrew Pinski |
08:14 | Re: [RFC][AArch64] function prologue analyzer in linux kernel | AKASHI Takahiro |
07:05 | Re: vectorization ICE for aarch64/armhf on SPEC2006 h264ref | Jim Wilson |
01:06 | Re: How to determine source location of pragma? | Vanush Vaswani |
January 12, 2016
22:36 | gcc-5-20160112 is now available | gccadmin |
22:22 | vectorization ICE for aarch64/armhf on SPEC2006 h264ref | Jim Wilson |
21:23 | Re: Some real-life feedback on -Wmisleading-indentation | David Brown |
18:04 | Re: [RFC][AArch64] function prologue analyzer in linux kernel | Will Deacon |
17:18 | Re: Some real-life feedback on -Wmisleading-indentation | Bernd Schmidt |
16:44 | Re: REG_CALL_DECL notes | Tom de Vries |
16:11 | REG_CALL_DECL notes | Jakub Jelinek |
09:47 | Re: ivopts vs. garbage collection | Julian Brown |
08:55 | Re: [RFC][AArch64] function prologue analyzer in linux kernel | AKASHI Takahiro |
08:22 | Re: [RFC][AArch64] function prologue analyzer in linux kernel | Andrew Pinski |
08:18 | Re: [RFC][AArch64] function prologue analyzer in linux kernel | Eric Botcazou |
07:02 | Re: [RFC][AArch64] function prologue analyzer in linux kernel | Andrew Pinski |
06:11 | Re: [RFC][AArch64] function prologue analyzer in linux kernel | AKASHI Takahiro |
05:44 | Re: Some real-life feedback on -Wmisleading-indentation | Jeff Law |
January 11, 2016
January 10, 2016
22:36 | gcc-6-20160110 is now available | gccadmin |
15:29 | Re: C++14 template code working in GCC 5.1 stops working in 5.2 and 5.3 | Jonathan Wakely |
14:55 | C++14 template code working in GCC 5.1 stops working in 5.2 and 5.3 | Yongwei Wu |
January 09, 2016
15:56 | Re: Hi! New to GCC | Mikhail Maltsev |
15:10 | Hi! New to GCC | Prasad Ghangal |
January 08, 2016
January 07, 2016
23:21 | Re: Re: gcc 4.9.0 do not build on OSX | Jesper Broge Jørgensen |
20:05 | __builtin_memcpy and alignment assumptions | Steve Ellcey |
18:41 | Re: GNU C library's libmvec and the GNU Compiler *Collection*. | Toon Moene |
16:25 | Re: [Extending and Contributing to GCC] | Jeff Law |
14:56 | Re: [RFC][AArch64] function prologue analyzer in linux kernel | Richard Earnshaw (lists) |
14:30 | Re: Test case mis-categorized as UNSUPPORTED? | Bin.Cheng |
14:22 | Re: [RFC][AArch64] function prologue analyzer in linux kernel | Will Deacon |
14:22 | Re: Test case mis-categorized as UNSUPPORTED? | Kyrill Tkachov |
14:15 | Test case mis-categorized as UNSUPPORTED? | Bin.Cheng |
13:36 | Re: Strange C++ function pointer test | Jonathan Wakely |
13:14 | Re: Strange C++ function pointer test | Jonathan Wakely |
00:55 | Re: [RFC] MIPS ABI Extension for IEEE Std 754 Non-Compliant Interlinking | Maciej W. Rozycki |
January 06, 2016
22:48 | Re: GNU C library's libmvec and the GNU Compiler *Collection*. | Toon Moene |
22:35 | gcc-4.9-20160106 is now available | gccadmin |
21:05 | Re: Strange C++ function pointer test | Jonathan Wakely |
21:03 | Re: Strange C++ function pointer test | Jonathan Wakely |
18:47 | GNU C library's libmvec and the GNU Compiler *Collection*. | Toon Moene |
15:26 | Re: ivopts vs. garbage collection | Jeff Law |
15:17 | ivopts vs. garbage collection | Ian Lance Taylor |
10:48 | Re: RS6000/PowerPC -mpaired | Segher Boessenkool |
04:34 | [Extending and Contributing to GCC] | Nguyán Sinh Ngác |
January 05, 2016
22:36 | gcc-5-20160105 is now available | gccadmin |
17:43 | RS6000/PowerPC -mpaired | Alan Lawrence |
01:35 | Successful GCC buiild and install | Earl Dominic Cipre |
January 04, 2016
21:26 | Re: Obsoleting Three RTEMS Targets | Jeff Law |
21:22 | Obsoleting Three RTEMS Targets | Joel Sherrill |
11:07 | Re: guidance for GSoC 2016 under GCC | Martin LiÅka |
09:32 | Re: Strange C++ function pointer test | Florian Weimer |
January 03, 2016
22:36 | gcc-6-20160103 is now available | gccadmin |
20:19 | Re: avr-gcc doesn't know address space wraps? | Georg-Johann Lay |
19:44 | Re: avr-gcc doesn't know address space wraps? | Ralph Doncaster |
18:36 | Re: avr-gcc doesn't know address space wraps? | Georg-Johann Lay |
17:51 | guidance for GSoC 2016 under GCC | vivek pandya |
17:30 | Re: avr-gcc doesn't know address space wraps? | Ralph Doncaster |
17:22 | Re: avr-gcc doesn't know address space wraps? | Georg-Johann Lay |
January 02, 2016
18:18 | Re: getting bugzilla access for my account | Jonathan Wakely |
14:04 | Re: getting bugzilla access for my account | Mike Frysinger |
11:42 | Re: Strange C++ function pointer test | Jonathan Wakely |
08:54 | Re: getting bugzilla access for my account | Marc Glisse |
08:52 | Re: getting bugzilla access for my account | Markus Trippelsdorf |
08:49 | getting bugzilla access for my account | Mike Frysinger |
January 01, 2016
23:43 | Re: Question on repeating -march flags | Martin Sebor |
Indexes: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] Site Nav: [Browse other archives for this mailing list]
[Browse other mailing lists at this site]