This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: basic asm and memory clobbers


> On Nov 23, 2015, at 4:36 PM, David Wohlferd <dw@LimeGreenSocks.com> wrote:
> 
> ...
>> The more I think about it, I'm just not keen on forcing all those old-style asms to change.
> 
> If you mean you aren't keen to change them to "clobber all," I'm with you.  If you are worried about changing them from basic to extended, what kinds of problems do you foresee?  I've been reading a lot of basic asm lately, and it seems to me that most of it would be fine with a simple colon.  Certainly no worse than the current behavior.

I'm not sure.  I have some asm("sync") which I think assume that this means asm("sync"::"memory")

	paul


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]