This is the mail archive of the mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: basic asm and memory clobbers

On 11/20/2015 8:14 AM, Richard Henderson wrote:
On 11/20/2015 04:34 PM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
Isn't that going to break too much code though?  I mean, e.g. including

I don't know.  My suspicion is very little.

But that's actually what I'd like to know before we start adjusting code in other ways wrt basic asms.

I can provide a little data here.

In an effort to gain some perspective, I've been looking at inline asm usage in the linux kernel (4.3). Clearly this isn't "typical usage," but it is probably one of the biggest users of inline asm, and likely has the best justifications for doing so (being an OS and all).

There are ~5,711 instances of inline asm in use. Of those, ~4,833 are extended and ~878 are basic.

I don't have any numbers about how many are top level vs in function, but let me see what I can do.

A quick look at libgcc shows that there are 109 extended and 45 basic asm statements. I'll see how many end up being top-level, but it looks like most of them.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]