This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: Repository for the conversion machinery
- From: "Frank Ch. Eigler" <fche at redhat dot com>
- To: Jeff Law <law at redhat dot com>
- Cc: Andrew Cagney <cagney at gnu dot org>, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org, esr at thyrsus dot com
- Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2015 13:06:44 -0400
- Subject: Re: Repository for the conversion machinery
- Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
- References: <20150828150239 dot GB9723 at thyrsus dot com> <alpine dot DEB dot 2 dot 10 dot 1508281518160 dot 5939 at digraph dot polyomino dot org dot uk> <alpine dot DEB dot 2 dot 10 dot 1508281520090 dot 5939 at digraph dot polyomino dot org dot uk> <55E081EA dot 7080304 at redhat dot com> <20150828155724 dot GB10894 at thyrsus dot com> <55E0994E dot 9070207 at redhat dot com> <CAJeAr6sw3NmGLrXYGcLMkXL9THgU6Odb0KrCJAJud6sKB3ob2w at mail dot gmail dot com> <y0m37yf2lhi dot fsf at fche dot csb> <CAJeAr6uwGtjw5MHbVEGbH5Phd_q7KfL+B2vuTEo-LP1LCTMrOw at mail dot gmail dot com> <55F98EF7 dot 4030401 at redhat dot com>
Hi -
> [...]
> >- rewrite history - use some totally arbitrary, and quickly outdated,
> >internet identity
> I think this is main reason why @gnu.org or @gmail.com style addresses
> are preferred over employer addresses when there's > 1 address on file.
That makes sense, but how many people are in cagney's shoes (with more
than one non-gcc.gnu.org email address in their commit history)? It
sounds like they should all be canonicalized to USER@gcc.gnu.org.
- FChE