This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: incremental compiler project
- From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely dot gcc at gmail dot com>
- To: Manuel LÃpez-IbÃÃez <lopezibanez at gmail dot com>
- Cc: Tom Tromey <tom at tromey dot com>, David Kunsman <dmkunsman at gmail dot com>, GCC Development <gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- Date: Fri, 4 Sep 2015 17:14:16 +0100
- Subject: Re: incremental compiler project
- Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
- References: <CAPVyUPD0eAyAuPOktpjqpY=UKx0t2YEvFQxMUMY2Lv2pwUAjLA at mail dot gmail dot com> <55E87708 dot 7010901 at gmail dot com> <87twrap6c2 dot fsf at tromey dot com> <CAESRpQC6LDfqqc_2AqyQhdvbSXjU4m8SmZcqzCZNvSpn-ofvxw at mail dot gmail dot com>
On 4 September 2015 at 16:57, Manuel LÃpez-IbÃÃez wrote:
> Clang++ is much faster yet it is doing more and tracking more data
> than cc1plus.
How much faster these days? In my experience for optimized builds of
large files the difference is not so impressive (for unoptimized
builds clang is definitely much faster).