This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: devbranches: ambigous characterisation of branches
- From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely dot gcc at gmail dot com>
- To: Wolfgang Hospital <WolfgaNg dot Hospital at arcor dot de>
- Cc: "gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- Date: Mon, 8 Jun 2015 09:37:12 +0100
- Subject: Re: devbranches: ambigous characterisation of branches
- Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
- References: <5574A950 dot 1050001 at arcor dot de>
On 7 June 2015 at 21:28, Wolfgang Hospital wrote:
> in the repository contents description at
> <https://gcc.gnu.org/svn.html#olddevbranches>, numerous branch names are
> listed as inactive, with some further comments. Right at the start there is
> the longest list of such names, followed by "These branches have been merged
> into the mainline.". Without "preceding" or "following",
> or at least leading dash or a trailing colon, I'm at a loss whether that
> refers to the branches named before or after.
Before.
It's an HTML definition list, of the form:
term
term
term
definition
term
definition
term
definition
It seems fairly clear to me, from the indentation, and the fact that
every set of branch names is followed by an indented description.