This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: gcc -S vs clang -S


> Note that at -O3 there is a difference still:
> clang (3.6.0):
>         addl    %esi, %edi
>         movl    %edi, %eax
>         retq
> 
> gcc (4.9.2)
>         leal    (%rdi,%rsi), %eax
>         ret
> 
> Can't tell which is best, if any.

But what's your point exactly here?  You cannot expect different compilers to 
generate exactly the same code on a given testcase for non-toy architectures.

Note that this kind of discussion is more appropriate for gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org

-- 
Eric Botcazou


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]