gcc archive
date index for May, 2015

This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Indexes: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Site Nav: [Browse other archives for this mailing list]
[Browse other mailing lists at this site]
Search: Limit to:

May 31, 2015
22:36 gcc-6-20150531 is now available gccadmin
17:54 Re: Precompiled headers - still useful feature? OndÅej BÃlka

May 30, 2015
13:02 Re: Better info for combine results in worse code generated Segher Boessenkool
08:25 Re: [RFC] Kernel livepatching support in GCC Li Bin
04:42 Re: s390: SImode pointers vs LR Jeff Law
02:46 Re: Identifying Chain of Recurrence Bin.Cheng
01:17 Re: Better info for combine results in worse code generated Alan Modra
00:57 s390: SImode pointers vs LR DJ Delorie

May 29, 2015
19:35 Re: Relocations to use when eliding plts H.J. Lu
18:00 Re: Relocations to use when eliding plts H.J. Lu
15:54 Re: [RFC] Design and Implementation for Path Splitting for Loop with Conditional IF-THEN-ELSE Jeff Law
15:38 Re: Relocations to use when eliding plts Richard Henderson
15:14 Re: Identifying Chain of Recurrence Pritam Gharat
15:03 Re: Identifying Pure and Const Functions Pritam Gharat
15:00 Re: Better info for combine results in worse code generated Segher Boessenkool
13:50 Re: Better info for combine results in worse code generated Alan Modra
12:58 Re: Better info for combine results in worse code generated Segher Boessenkool
07:56 Re: Identifying Pure and Const Functions Marek Polacek
07:46 Identifying Pure and Const Functions Pritam Gharat
05:04 Re: Identifying Chain of Recurrence Bin.Cheng
04:41 Identifying Chain of Recurrence Pritam Gharat
03:11 Re: Better info for combine results in worse code generated Alan Modra
00:01 avr non-optimal optimization Ralph Doncaster

May 28, 2015
22:41 Re: [RFC] Kernel livepatching support in GCC Jim Wilson
22:35 gcc-4.8-20150528 is now available gccadmin
20:36 Re: Relocations to use when eliding plts Rich Felker
19:42 Re: Better info for combine results in worse code generated Segher Boessenkool
19:41 Re: Relocations to use when eliding plts Jakub Jelinek
19:29 Re: Relocations to use when eliding plts Rich Felker
18:41 Re: Relocations to use when eliding plts Richard Henderson
18:05 Re: [RFC] Kernel livepatching support in GCC Andi Kleen
17:59 Re: Relocations to use when eliding plts Rich Felker
17:11 Re: Better info for combine results in worse code generated David Edelsohn
16:09 Re: Relocations to use when eliding plts H.J. Lu
16:02 Re: Relocations to use when eliding plts Jakub Jelinek
15:52 Re: Relocations to use when eliding plts Richard Henderson
15:42 Re: Relocations to use when eliding plts H.J. Lu
15:38 Re: [RFC] Kernel livepatching support in GCC Andreas Krebbel
15:29 Re: Relocations to use when eliding plts Richard Henderson
15:14 Re: Better info for combine results in worse code generated Alan Modra
14:47 Re: Better info for combine results in worse code generated David Edelsohn
14:39 Better info for combine results in worse code generated Alan Modra
11:27 Re: Relocations to use when eliding plts H.J. Lu
09:17 Re: [RFC] Kernel livepatching support in GCC Maxim Kuvyrkov
08:59 Re: [RFC] Kernel livepatching support in GCC Richard Biener
08:40 [RFC] Kernel livepatching support in GCC Maxim Kuvyrkov
00:45 Re: Relocations to use when eliding plts H.J. Lu

May 27, 2015
22:35 gcc-4.9-20150527 is now available gccadmin
21:38 Re: Relocations to use when eliding plts H.J. Lu
20:04 Relocations to use when eliding plts Richard Henderson
13:20 Re: [i386] Scalar DImode instructions on XMM registers Ilya Enkovich
09:44 Re: Precompiled headers - still useful feature? Jonathan Wakely
09:01 Re: Precompiled headers - still useful feature? Markus Trippelsdorf
08:14 Precompiled headers - still useful feature? Martin LiÅka
03:31 Re: [i386] Scalar DImode instructions on XMM registers Jeff Law
01:41 Re: [c++std-parallel-1651] Re: Compilers and RCU readers: Once more unto the breach! Paul E. McKenney

May 26, 2015
22:36 gcc-5-20150526 is now available gccadmin
17:37 Re: [c++std-parallel-1641] Re: Compilers and RCU readers: Once more unto the breach! Torvald Riegel
17:08 Re: [c++std-parallel-1611] Compilers and RCU readers: Once more unto the breach! Torvald Riegel
10:41 Re: Balanced partition map for Firefox Richard Biener

May 25, 2015
15:27 Re: [i386] Scalar DImode instructions on XMM registers Ilya Enkovich
14:02 Re: Questions about C as used/implemented in practice Peter Sewell

May 24, 2015
22:35 gcc-6-20150524 is now available gccadmin

May 22, 2015
18:55 Re: Compilers and RCU readers: Once more unto the breach! Paul E. McKenney
18:24 Re: IBM z13 support for older GCCs Andreas Krebbel
17:30 Re: Compilers and RCU readers: Once more unto the breach! Will Deacon
13:13 Re: Compilers and RCU readers: Once more unto the breach! Paul E. McKenney
13:11 Re: Compilers and RCU readers: Once more unto the breach! Paul E. McKenney
12:47 Re: [RFC] Combine related fail of gcc.target/powerpc/ti_math1.c Segher Boessenkool
12:44 Re: IBM z13 support for older GCCs Jakub Jelinek
12:43 Re: IBM z13 support for older GCCs Joseph Myers
12:01 Re: [i386] Scalar DImode instructions on XMM registers Ilya Enkovich
10:43 Re: Compilers and RCU readers: Once more unto the breach! Richard Kenner
08:54 Re: IBM z13 support for older GCCs Richard Biener
08:53 Re: [i386] Scalar DImode instructions on XMM registers Ilya Enkovich
08:39 Re: IBM z13 support for older GCCs Andreas Krebbel
08:28 Re: IBM z13 support for older GCCs Jakub Jelinek
08:22 Re: IBM z13 support for older GCCs Richard Biener
08:12 Re: [RFC] Combine related fail of gcc.target/powerpc/ti_math1.c Alan Modra
08:11 IBM z13 support for older GCCs Andreas Krebbel
06:43 Re: Compilers and RCU readers: Once more unto the breach! Ingo Molnar
04:30 Re: optimization question Martin Uecker
02:18 Re: [RFC] Combine related fail of gcc.target/powerpc/ti_math1.c Alan Modra

May 21, 2015
22:35 gcc-4.8-20150521 is now available gccadmin
22:02 Re: Compilers and RCU readers: Once more unto the breach! Paul E. McKenney
21:46 Re: Is there a way to adjust alignment of DImode and DFmode? H.J. Lu
21:40 Re: Is there a way to adjust alignment of DImode and DFmode? H.J. Lu
21:25 Re: Is there a way to adjust alignment of DImode and DFmode? H.J. Lu
21:11 Re: [RFC] Combine related fail of gcc.target/powerpc/ti_math1.c Oleg Endo
21:08 Re: Is there a way to adjust alignment of DImode and DFmode? H.J. Lu
20:56 Re: Is there a way to adjust alignment of DImode and DFmode? Jim Wilson
20:42 Re: Compilers and RCU readers: Once more unto the breach! Linus Torvalds
20:28 Re: [i386] Scalar DImode instructions on XMM registers Jakub Jelinek
20:23 Re: [i386] Scalar DImode instructions on XMM registers Jeff Law
20:02 Re: Compilers and RCU readers: Once more unto the breach! Paul E. McKenney
19:24 Re: Compilers and RCU readers: Once more unto the breach! Will Deacon
19:08 Re: [i386] Scalar DImode instructions on XMM registers Vladimir Makarov
18:59 Re: [RFC] Combine related fail of gcc.target/powerpc/ti_math1.c Richard Henderson
18:44 Re: [RFC] Combine related fail of gcc.target/powerpc/ti_math1.c Segher Boessenkool
18:37 Re: [c++std-parallel-1632] Re: Compilers and RCU readers: Once more unto the breach! Paul E. McKenney
18:34 Re: [RFC] Combine related fail of gcc.target/powerpc/ti_math1.c Richard Henderson
16:17 Re: [c++std-parallel-1632] Re: Compilers and RCU readers: Once more unto the breach! Michael Matz
15:10 Re: [c++std-parallel-1632] Re: Compilers and RCU readers: Once more unto the breach! Paul E. McKenney
14:22 Re: [c++std-parallel-1632] Re: Compilers and RCU readers: Once more unto the breach! Michael Matz
12:45 Re: optimization question mark maule
12:39 Re: [RFC] Combine related fail of gcc.target/powerpc/ti_math1.c Segher Boessenkool
10:36 [RFC] Combine related fail of gcc.target/powerpc/ti_math1.c Alan Modra
09:55 Re: [i386] Scalar DImode instructions on XMM registers Ilya Enkovich
03:27 Re: [i386] Scalar DImode instructions on XMM registers Vladimir Makarov

May 20, 2015
22:35 gcc-4.9-20150520 is now available gccadmin
19:14 Re: optimization question Martin Uecker
18:16 Re: [c++std-parallel-1632] Re: Compilers and RCU readers: Once more unto the breach! Paul E. McKenney
18:16 Re: Compilers and RCU readers: Once more unto the breach! Paul E. McKenney
17:32 Re: Is there a way to adjust alignment of DImode and DFmode? Paul_Koning
17:22 Re: Is there a way to adjust alignment of DImode and DFmode? Jakub Jelinek
17:19 Re: Is there a way to adjust alignment of DImode and DFmode? Paul_Koning
17:00 Is there a way to adjust alignment of DImode and DFmode? H.J. Lu
15:55 Re: Compilers and RCU readers: Once more unto the breach! Andrew Haley
15:46 Re: Compilers and RCU readers: Once more unto the breach! Will Deacon
15:46 Re: Compilers and RCU readers: Once more unto the breach! David Howells
15:18 Re: Compilers and RCU readers: Once more unto the breach! Paul E. McKenney
14:15 Re: Compilers and RCU readers: Once more unto the breach! Ramana Radhakrishnan
14:04 Re: Compilers and RCU readers: Once more unto the breach! Paul E. McKenney
14:03 Re: [c++std-parallel-1624] Re: Compilers and RCU readers: Once more unto the breach! Paul E. McKenney
13:44 Re: Compilers and RCU readers: Once more unto the breach! Ramana Radhakrishnan
13:38 Re: Compilers and RCU readers: Once more unto the breach! David Howells
13:30 Re: Compilers and RCU readers: Once more unto the breach! Paul E. McKenney
13:18 Re: Compilers and RCU readers: Once more unto the breach! David Howells
12:34 Re: optimization question Andrew Haley
12:22 Re: Compilers and RCU readers: Once more unto the breach! Paul E. McKenney
12:05 Re: optimization question mark maule
12:02 Re: [c++std-parallel-1614] Re: Compilers and RCU readers: Once more unto the breach! Paul E. McKenney
12:01 Re: [c++std-parallel-1616] Re: Compilers and RCU readers: Once more unto the breach! Paul E. McKenney
11:47 Re: Compilers and RCU readers: Once more unto the breach! Will Deacon
09:03 Re: [c++std-parallel-1614] Re: Compilers and RCU readers: Once more unto the breach! Richard Biener
08:27 Re: optimization question Richard Biener
08:17 Re: [i386] Scalar DImode instructions on XMM registers Ilya Enkovich
07:35 Re: [c++std-parallel-1614] Re: Compilers and RCU readers: Once more unto the breach! Jens Maurer
02:41 Re: Compilers and RCU readers: Once more unto the breach! Paul E. McKenney
02:34 Re: Compilers and RCU readers: Once more unto the breach! Paul E. McKenney
02:10 Re: Compilers and RCU readers: Once more unto the breach! Linus Torvalds
01:57 Re: Compilers and RCU readers: Once more unto the breach! Linus Torvalds
00:55 Compilers and RCU readers: Once more unto the breach! Paul E. McKenney

May 19, 2015
22:36 gcc-5-20150519 is now available gccadmin
16:09 Re: target attributes/pragmas changing vector instruction availability and custom types Kyrill Tkachov
15:34 Re: optimization question mark maule
15:28 Re: optimization question Andrew Haley
15:22 Re: [i386] Scalar DImode instructions on XMM registers Vladimir Makarov
15:21 Re: target attributes/pragmas changing vector instruction availability and custom types Kyrill Tkachov
15:14 Re: optimization question mark maule
15:10 Re: optimization question Martin Sebor
14:55 Re: target attributes/pragmas changing vector instruction availability and custom types Christian Bruel
14:17 target attributes/pragmas changing vector instruction availability and custom types Kyrill Tkachov
12:44 Balanced partition map for Firefox Martin LiÅka
11:09 Fwd: Problem in using BDD libraries with GCC Plugin Nishant Sahni
10:52 Fwd: Problem in using BDD libraries with GCC Plugin Nishant Sahni
03:57 Re: optimization question Kugan
03:21 Re: WPP capabilities in gcc Martin Sebor
02:59 Re: optimization question mark maule
00:05 Re: optimization question Martin Sebor

May 18, 2015
20:01 optimization question mark maule
18:31 Re: ldm/stm bus error Jim Wilson
16:51 Re: ldm/stm bus error Umesh Kalappa
16:38 Re: ldm/stm bus error Richard Earnshaw
16:18 Re: ldm/stm bus error Joey Ye
15:50 Re: ldm/stm bus error Richard Earnshaw
15:31 [gomp4] bootstrap broken, function enclosing_target_ctx defined but not used Tom de Vries
13:11 Re: May 2015 Toolchain Update Nicholas Clifton
12:52 Re: [x86-64-psABI] RFC: Add R_X86_64_RELAX_PC32 and R_X86_64_RELAX_PLT32 H.J. Lu
12:45 Re: [x86-64-psABI] RFC: Add R_X86_64_RELAX_PC32 and R_X86_64_RELAX_PLT32 Michael Matz
12:13 Re: [i386] Scalar DImode instructions on XMM registers Ilya Enkovich
10:22 Re: if-else-if chains to switch conversion optimization Richard Biener
09:58 Re: May 2015 Toolchain Update Alexander Monakov
09:46 Re: target attributes, pragmas and preprocessor macros Kyrill Tkachov
09:26 May 2015 Toolchain Update Nick Clifton
09:06 ldm/stm bus error Umesh Kalappa
08:25 Re: target attributes, pragmas and preprocessor macros Kyrill Tkachov
06:26 Re: target attributes, pragmas and preprocessor macros Christian Bruel
02:04 Re: Question about macro _GLIBCXX_RES_LIMITS in libstdc++ testsuite Bin.Cheng
01:40 Re: Question about macro _GLIBCXX_RES_LIMITS in libstdc++ testsuite Jim Wilson

May 17, 2015
22:36 gcc-6-20150517 is now available gccadmin
17:22 Re: pre_modify/post_modify with scaled register Oleg Endo
17:09 Re: pre_modify/post_modify with scaled register Jeff Law
16:21 pre_modify/post_modify with scaled register Jon Beniston
15:16 Re: [x86-64-psABI] RFC: Add R_X86_64_RELAX_PC32 and R_X86_64_RELAX_PLT32 H.J. Lu
08:16 Re: Question about macro _GLIBCXX_RES_LIMITS in libstdc++ testsuite Bin.Cheng

May 16, 2015
19:53 Re: [RFC] Design and Implementation for Path Splitting for Loop with Conditional IF-THEN-ELSE shmeel gutl
12:49 [RFC] Design and Implementation for Path Splitting for Loop with Conditional IF-THEN-ELSE Ajit Kumar Agarwal
09:35 Re: Question about macro _GLIBCXX_RES_LIMITS in libstdc++ testsuite Hans-Peter Nilsson

May 15, 2015
17:47 if-else-if chains to switch conversion optimization Daniel Gutson
16:33 Re: Passsing unfinished types to gen_type_die_with_usage Jason Merrill
06:29 Re: Broken test gcc.target/i386/sibcall-2.c Uros Bizjak

May 14, 2015
22:35 gcc-4.8-20150514 is now available gccadmin
14:29 Passsing unfinished types to gen_type_die_with_usage Jan Hubicka
14:16 Re: Missing barrier in outof_cfglayout Jeff Law

May 13, 2015
22:49 Re: [gomp4] Basic -misa support for nvptx (was: How to use old GPU (Fermi) in gcc with OpenACC?) Joseph Myers
22:35 gcc-4.9-20150513 is now available gccadmin
21:29 [gomp4] Basic -misa support for nvptx (was: How to use old GPU (Fermi) in gcc with OpenACC?) Thomas Schwinge
20:17 Re: Fwd: xtensa PR65730 Richard Henderson
18:17 Re: Broken test gcc.target/i386/sibcall-2.c Alexander Monakov
17:29 Broken test gcc.target/i386/sibcall-2.c Alexander Monakov
15:43 target attributes, pragmas and preprocessor macros Kyrill Tkachov
14:50 Re: gcc -S vs clang -S Jakub Jelinek
14:41 Re: gcc -S vs clang -S Martin Sebor
12:30 Re: Missing barrier in outof_cfglayout Georg-Johann Lay
11:02 Re: [x86-64-psABI] RFC: Add R_X86_64_RELAX_PC32 and R_X86_64_RELAX_PLT32 H.J. Lu
06:23 Re: [x86-64-psABI] RFC: Add R_X86_64_RELAX_PC32 and R_X86_64_RELAX_PLT32 Jan Beulich
01:40 Re: gcc -S vs clang -S Andrew Pinski
01:36 Re: gcc -S vs clang -S Fei Ding

May 12, 2015
22:35 gcc-5-20150512 is now available gccadmin
18:42 Re: [x86-64-psABI] RFC: Add R_X86_64_RELAX_PC32 and R_X86_64_RELAX_PLT32 H.J. Lu
15:30 Re: gcc -S vs clang -S Eric Botcazou
15:13 Re: Missing barrier in outof_cfglayout Jeff Law
14:58 Re: Missing barrier in outof_cfglayout Georg-Johann Lay
13:18 Re: gcc -S vs clang -S Olivier Galibert
12:37 RE: AutoFDO profile toolchain is open-sourced Aditya K
02:07 Re: gcc -S vs clang -S pinskia
01:16 gcc -S vs clang -S Thiago Farina

May 11, 2015
20:43 Re: Missing barrier in outof_cfglayout Steven Bosscher
17:37 Re: Missing barrier in outof_cfglayout Georg-Johann Lay
16:58 Re: Missing barrier in outof_cfglayout Jeff Law
16:19 Missing barrier in outof_cfglayout Georg-Johann Lay
15:58 [committed, PATCH] Rename EM_486 to EM_IAMCU H.J. Lu
15:55 A new psABI for Intel MCU H.J. Lu
15:52 Re: [x86-64-psABI] RFC: Add R_X86_64_RELAX_PC32 and R_X86_64_RELAX_PLT32 H.J. Lu
15:48 Re: [x86-64-psABI] RFC: Add R_X86_64_RELAX_PC32 and R_X86_64_RELAX_PLT32 Michael Matz
14:59 [x86-64-psABI] RFC: Add R_X86_64_RELAX_PC32 and R_X86_64_RELAX_PLT32 H.J. Lu
08:52 Errors Summary 18d53b+c826wv11dtfp8
08:33 5.1.0 / 5.1.1 mingw64 bootstrap LTO failure questions Matt Breedlove

May 10, 2015
22:35 gcc-6-20150510 is now available gccadmin

May 09, 2015
17:26 How to use old GPU (Fermi) in gcc with OpenACC? Satoshi_OHSHIMA
15:45 Re: Merging debug-early work? Aldy Hernandez
14:33 Re: AutoFDO profile toolchain is open-sourced Jan Hubicka

May 08, 2015
20:34 RE: AutoFDO profile toolchain is open-sourced Aditya K
20:15 Re: nonnull attribute (was: Re: Couldn't `function(arg[static 3])` imply nonnull and array size in C?) Joseph Myers
18:59 nonnull attribute (was: Re: Couldn't `function(arg[static 3])` imply nonnull and array size in C?) Martin Uecker
18:19 Re: AutoFDO profile toolchain is open-sourced Dehao Chen
13:26 Re: Change to C++11 by default? Krzesimir Nowak
11:04 Re: Couldn't `function(arg[static 3])` imply nonnull and array size in C? Joseph Myers
09:21 Re: Change to C++11 by default? Allan Sandfeld Jensen
09:00 Re: AutoFDO profile toolchain is open-sourced Ilya Palachev
08:51 Re: Merging debug-early work? Richard Biener
08:15 Re: Couldn't `function(arg[static 3])` imply nonnull and array size in C? Manuel LÃpez-IbÃÃez

May 07, 2015
23:38 Problems with GCC Wiki Mikhail Maltsev
22:35 gcc-4.8-20150507 is now available gccadmin
19:10 Re: Change to C++11 by default? Marek Polacek
19:09 Re: Change to C++11 by default? Markus Trippelsdorf
18:46 Change to C++11 by default? Jason Merrill
18:22 Re: [i386] Scalar DImode instructions on XMM registers Richard Henderson
18:08 Re: [i386] Scalar DImode instructions on XMM registers Richard Henderson
17:59 Re: [i386] Scalar DImode instructions on XMM registers Uros Bizjak
17:51 Re: Couldn't `function(arg[static 3])` imply nonnull and array size in C? Martin Uecker
16:24 Re: [i386] Scalar DImode instructions on XMM registers Richard Henderson
16:13 Re: ANN: gcc-python-plugin 0.14 Jonathan Wakely
15:29 Re: Merging debug-early work? Aldy Hernandez
12:44 Re: Is it Okay for GCC to do the following simplifications with "-ffast-math" flag Renlin Li
10:09 Re: ANN: gcc-python-plugin 0.14 Mikhail Maltsev
05:40 Re: [OR1K port] where do I change the function frame structure Jim Wilson
02:53 Re: Compiler warnings while compiling gcc with clangâ Martin Uecker

May 06, 2015
22:36 gcc-4.9-20150506 is now available gccadmin
18:50 ANN: gcc-python-plugin 0.14 David Malcolm
18:24 Re: Is it Okay for GCC to do the following simplifications with "-ffast-math" flag Richard Biener
15:56 Re: Is it Okay for GCC to do the following simplifications with "-ffast-math" flag Michael Matz
14:18 Re: [i386] Scalar DImode instructions on XMM registers Ilya Enkovich
13:20 Re: Is it Okay for GCC to do the following simplifications with "-ffast-math" flag Jeff Law
11:54 Question stanleyomachieful
11:22 Re: Merging debug-early work? Richard Biener
11:11 Re: Is it Okay for GCC to do the following simplifications with "-ffast-math" flag Richard Biener
04:37 Re: Compiler warnings while compiling gcc with clangâ Andrew Pinski
04:00 RE: Compiler warnings while compiling gcc with clang‏ Aditya K
03:19 Re: Compiler warnings while compiling gcc with clangâ pinskia
03:13 RE: Compiler warnings while compiling gcc with clang‏ Aditya K
00:56 Re: Is it Okay for GCC to do the following simplifications with "-ffast-math" flag msebor
00:20 [OR1K port] where do I change the function frame structure Peter T. Breuer

May 05, 2015
22:36 gcc-5-20150505 is now available gccadmin
22:33 Merging debug-early work? Aldy Hernandez
21:47 Re: Is it Okay for GCC to do the following simplifications with "-ffast-math" flag Jeff Law
20:57 Re: Compiler warnings while compiling gcc with clangâ Jonathan Wakely
20:06 GOMP: ICV: run-sched-var - Why is dynamic default and not static? Andreas Hollmann
18:06 Re: Shared object compiled with g++ is not unloaded Jakub Jelinek
18:01 Re: Shared object compiled with g++ is not unloaded Max Dmitrichenko
16:10 Re: [RFC] Design for flag bit outputs from asms Segher Boessenkool
15:37 Re: [RFC] Design for flag bit outputs from asms Linus Torvalds
14:41 Re: Target attribute hooks questions Kyrill Tkachov
14:40 Re: Compiler warnings while compiling gcc with clang‏ -- clang compilation speed on building GCC Vladimir Makarov
14:25 Re: Target attribute hooks questions Christian Bruel
13:50 Re: [RFC] Design for flag bit outputs from asms Segher Boessenkool
13:38 Target attribute hooks questions Kyrill Tkachov
13:27 Is it Okay for GCC to do the following simplifications with "-ffast-math" flag Renlin Li
11:39 RE: Compiler warnings while compiling gcc with clang‏ Aditya K
10:38 Re: Compiler warnings while compiling gcc with clangâ Renato Golin
10:24 Re: Compiler warnings while compiling gcc with clangâ Trevor Saunders
10:09 Re: Compiler warnings while compiling gcc with clangâ Trevor Saunders
09:01 Re: [RFC] Design for flag bit outputs from asms Gabriel Paubert
08:12 Re: Compiler warnings while compiling gcc with clangâ pinskia
08:01 Re: Compiler warnings while compiling gcc with clangâ Renato Golin
04:59 Re: Compiler warnings while compiling gcc with clangâ Andrew Pinski
04:42 Compiler warnings while compiling gcc with clang‏ Aditya K

May 04, 2015
21:23 Re: [RFC] Design for flag bit outputs from asms H. Peter Anvin
20:57 Re: [RFC] Design for flag bit outputs from asms Richard Henderson
20:45 Re: [RFC] Design for flag bit outputs from asms Linus Torvalds
20:42 Re: [RFC] Design for flag bit outputs from asms H. Peter Anvin
20:36 Re: [RFC] Design for flag bit outputs from asms Linus Torvalds
20:33 Re: [RFC] Design for flag bit outputs from asms Richard Henderson
20:28 Re: [RFC] Design for flag bit outputs from asms H. Peter Anvin
20:14 Re: [RFC] Design for flag bit outputs from asms H. Peter Anvin
19:33 [RFC] Design for flag bit outputs from asms Richard Henderson
16:28 Re: Couldn't `function(arg[static 3])` imply nonnull and array size in C? Manuel LÃpez-IbÃÃez
05:40 Re: Couldn't `function(arg[static 3])` imply nonnull and array size in C? Martin Uecker

May 03, 2015
22:36 gcc-6-20150503 is now available gccadmin
11:15 Re: wwwdocs/htdocs/onlinedocs/5.1.0 - New directory Gerald Pfeifer

May 02, 2015
17:40 Re: Build oddity (Mode = sf\|df messages in output) Jim Wilson
17:35 Couldn't `function(arg[static 3])` imply nonnull and array size in C? Campbell Barton


Indexes: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Site Nav: [Browse other archives for this mailing list]
[Browse other mailing lists at this site]
Search: Limit to:

Mail converted by MHonArc