This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: Git-only namespace for vendor branches
- From: Andreas Schwab <schwab at linux-m68k dot org>
- To: Maxim Kuvyrkov <maxim dot kuvyrkov at linaro dot org>
- Cc: Jason Merrill <jason at redhat dot com>, GCC Development <gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2015 14:31:41 +0200
- Subject: Re: Git-only namespace for vendor branches
- Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
- References: <23806271-3D9D-485C-8E4C-D72546E7BB2F at linaro dot org>
Maxim Kuvyrkov <maxim.kuvyrkov@linaro.org> writes:
> We want to get to:
> 1. Git repository has linaro/* namespace that hosts linaro/gcc-5-branch,
> linaro-dev/sched-model-prefetch and linaro-dev/type-promotion-pass.
> 2. Ideally, linaro/* namespace would also have branches
> linaro/gcc-4_8-branch and linaro/gcc-4_9-branch mirrored from SVN. My
> understanding is that git-svn will not cooperate on this one, so absence
> of these branches from Git mirror is OK.
>
> My main question is whether it is OK to overlay git-only namespace on the
> same-named svn namespace?
Since the svn branches live in the refs/remotes namespace there is no
conflict with any branches in the refs/heads namespace.
Andreas.
--
Andreas Schwab, schwab@linux-m68k.org
GPG Key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756 01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5
"And now for something completely different."