This is the mail archive of the mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

RE: IRA preferencing issues

Interestingly even when the preferences are accurate, lra_constraints
completely ignores the preferred/allocno class. If the cost of 2 alternatives
is equal in every way (which will be the case if they are both legal matches
as the standard cost functions are not used at all), the wrong one may be 
chosen depending on the order in the MD file. This is particularly bad when the
spill optimization pass later removes some of the spills and correctly allocates
them to their preferred allocno class...

Forcing win = true if the register class of the alternative intersects with 
the preferred class generates significantly better spill code for cases where
the preference is accurate (ie. not just ALL_REGS), resulting in far less
confusion between integer and FP registers. 

So shouldn't get_reg_class return the preference/allocno class like below rather
than NO_REGS?

diff --git a/gcc/lra-constraints.c b/gcc/lra-constraints.c
index 0ddd842..f38914a 100644
--- a/gcc/lra-constraints.c
+++ b/gcc/lra-constraints.c
@@ -263,7 +263,10 @@ get_reg_class (int regno)
   if (regno >= new_regno_start)
     return lra_get_allocno_class (regno);
-  return NO_REGS;
+  return reg_preferred_class (regno);


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]