This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: Bugzilla vs 5.0 milestone
- From: Richard Biener <richard dot guenther at gmail dot com>
- To: Andreas Schwab <schwab at suse dot de>
- Cc: Jakub Jelinek <jakub at redhat dot com>, Paolo Carlini <paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com>, "gcc at gnu dot org" <gcc at gnu dot org>
- Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2015 10:19:29 +0100
- Subject: Re: Bugzilla vs 5.0 milestone
- Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
- References: <55134E7E dot 3000409 at oracle dot com> <CAFiYyc2OJbaAi1ewtm+EHKx9x+1bSwYVYMPDP58FcMfqkYdFMg at mail dot gmail dot com> <20150326085228 dot GT1746 at tucnak dot redhat dot com> <mvm619oyva3 dot fsf at hawking dot suse dot de>
On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 10:15 AM, Andreas Schwab <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> Jakub Jelinek <email@example.com> writes:
>> Though, 5.0 milestone isn't completely meaningless, it means plan to fix it
>> already before the release.
> That's true for all 5.1 milestone bugs as well. :-)
It would be "fix during development aka stage1-3" vs. "fix for 5.1"
which we'd use
during stage4 (where we also forgot to bump the patchlevel version to get trunk
to GCC 5.0.1 as documented).
> Andreas Schwab, SUSE Labs, firstname.lastname@example.org
> GPG Key fingerprint = 0196 BAD8 1CE9 1970 F4BE 1748 E4D4 88E3 0EEA B9D7
> "And now for something completely different."