This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: gcc wiki project
- From: Martin Jambor <mjambor at suse dot cz>
- To: "gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2015 13:33:56 +0100
- Subject: Re: gcc wiki project
- Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
- References: <CAPVyUPAnzwns=Wvru17fhWgQErGwXxAXmW9so=Q2dk6+9uwcAQ at mail dot gmail dot com> <20150324121626 dot GD17943 at virgil dot suse> <CAH6eHdT_Vf8rczr5KBX75phMa7nXmVzyJqvM9XuOwQ+d2snOjQ at mail dot gmail dot com>
On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 12:20:46PM +0000, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> > On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 06:14:30PM -0500, David Kunsman wrote:
> >> Hello, I was just reading through the current projects wiki page and I
> >> noticed how out of date pretty much all of them are. So I was
> >> planning on doing "spring cleaning" by going down the list tracking
> >> down what has been and what needs to be down and updating all the
> >> wikis. Do you think this is something that is worthwhile to work on?
> Yes, I think that would be very useful.
> On 24 March 2015 at 12:16, Martin Jambor wrote:
> > Yes, I think that even just moving hopelessly outdated stuff to some
> > "Archive" section,
> I don't see any need to move pages (that would break old links).
You're right, by section I meant the page sections where links to
outdated contents are. I do not know why I thought for a moment that
changing the URL would happen too.
> Just add a header to old pages saying they are outdated, and stop
> linking to them from other pages that imply they are current. There
> could be a single ArchivedProjects page, or just sub-section of
> another page, that links to the old projects, but no need to move the
> old project pages themselves.
This is exactly what I actually had in mind.