This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: How to implement '@' GDB-like operator for libcc1
- From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely dot gcc at gmail dot com>
- To: Jan Kratochvil <jan dot kratochvil at redhat dot com>
- Cc: Manuel LÃpez-IbÃÃez <lopezibanez at gmail dot com>, Phil Muldoon <pmuldoon at redhat dot com>, gcc Mailing List <gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2015 10:29:31 +0000
- Subject: Re: How to implement '@' GDB-like operator for libcc1
- Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
- References: <CAESRpQAtr_YWO2VM3XuZoxS3Tk0v=nxV0g1HvOTn=RbFfez-WA at mail dot gmail dot com> <CAESRpQBeTmybaoasUH1K-hH5RPa2AY4gnKqmyvuKzyeBLMb5TA at mail dot gmail dot com> <20150316083236 dot GA25027 at host1 dot jankratochvil dot net> <CAESRpQCu0aFge-gqGb3bPLaDP+3OJdQD-KJVnOmi+hSG53-OqQ at mail dot gmail dot com> <20150316095808 dot GA32444 at host1 dot jankratochvil dot net>
On 16 March 2015 at 09:58, Jan Kratochvil wrote:
> I expected to learn GCC parser on this IMO-simpler case so one can later
> implement for example the '{TYPE} ADDR' GDB extension, dropping C++ class
> protections,
There's the -fno-access-control flag to disable access checking, so I
would have expected "libcc1plus" to just set that when compiling C++.