This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.
Indexes: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] Site Nav: [Browse other archives for this mailing list]
[Browse other mailing lists at this site]
March 31, 2015
| 22:21 | how to modify gcc to compile a[b] differently | Gry Gunvor |
| 21:47 | RE: Proposal for adding splay_tree_find (to find elements without updating the nodes). | Aditya K |
| 19:48 | Re: how to use the uninstalled C & C++ compilers? | Jakub Jelinek |
| 19:37 | Re: how to use the uninstalled C & C++ compilers? | Matthias Klose |
| 15:34 | Re: Question about Gimple FE | Trevor Saunders |
| 11:58 | Re: how to use the uninstalled C & C++ compilers? | Andreas Schwab |
| 11:09 | how to use the uninstalled C & C++ compilers? | Matthias Klose |
| 07:09 | RE: Proposal for adding splay_tree_find (to find elements without updating the nodes). | Thomas Schwinge |
| 01:13 | Re: Q.: inconsistent (?) warnings about functions called through non-compatible types | Mikhail Maltsev |
March 30, 2015
| 23:18 | Re: [website, changes] (was: Re: warning about const multidimensional array as function parameter) | Manuel López-Ibáñez |
| 22:28 | RE: Proposal for adding splay_tree_find (to find elements without updating the nodes). | Aditya K |
| 21:24 | Re: [website, changes] (was: Re: warning about const multidimensional array as function parameter) | Martin Uecker |
| 15:17 | Re: Fixing inconsistent uses of address costs | Kyrill Tkachov |
| 14:23 | Selecting an architecture tuple for the Rumprun toolchain | Martin Lucina |
| 09:40 | Re: Question about Gimple FE | Richard Biener |
| 09:39 | Re: Fixing inconsistent uses of address costs | Kyrill Tkachov |
| 09:39 | Re: Fixing inconsistent uses of address costs | Kyrill Tkachov |
| 09:36 | Re: Question about Gimple FE | Richard Biener |
| 07:14 | Re: Fixing inconsistent uses of address costs | Bin.Cheng |
| 07:07 | Re: Fixing inconsistent uses of address costs | Bin.Cheng |
March 29, 2015
| 22:36 | gcc-5-20150329 is now available | gccadmin |
| 21:33 | Re: Q.: inconsistent (?) warnings about functions called through non-compatible types | Jonathan Wakely |
| 20:18 | Re: Q.: inconsistent (?) warnings about functions called through non-compatible types | Godmar Back |
| 19:26 | Re: Q.: inconsistent (?) warnings about functions called through non-compatible types | Andreas Schwab |
| 18:32 | Q.: inconsistent (?) warnings about functions called through non-compatible types | Godmar Back |
| 16:19 | Re: __attribute__ aligned could be more efficient | Mason |
| 15:35 | Re: __attribute__ aligned could be more efficient | Andreas Schwab |
| 15:19 | __attribute__ aligned could be more efficient | Mason |
| 14:24 | Re: Removing an output file when test case has terminate | Jerry DeLisle |
| 14:21 | Re: Removing an output file when test case has terminate | Thomas Koenig |
| 11:50 | Re: Removing an output file when test case has terminate | Janne Blomqvist |
| 11:28 | Removing an output file when test case has terminate | Thomas Koenig |
March 28, 2015
| 17:00 | Re: Offloading GSOC 2015 | guray ozen |
March 27, 2015
| 17:32 | Re: Fixing inconsistent uses of address costs | Sandra Loosemore |
| 09:43 | Re: Fixing inconsistent uses of address costs | Kyrill Tkachov |
| 09:30 | Re: trunk revision 221714 gets segfault during lto bootstrap. | Jan Hubicka |
| 09:23 | Re: trunk revision 221714 gets segfault during lto bootstrap. | Jan Hubicka |
| 07:34 | trunk revision 221714 gets segfault during lto bootstrap. | Toon Moene |
| 07:16 | Re: String literals in __init functions | Mathias Krause |
| 03:29 | Re: Fixing inconsistent uses of address costs | Bin.Cheng |
| 00:12 | Re: [gsoc] Generic addressing mode selection | Erik Varga |
March 26, 2015
| 22:46 | Re: [gsoc] Generic addressing mode selection | Oleg Endo |
| 22:36 | gcc-4.8-20150326 is now available | gccadmin |
| 22:16 | Re: String literals in __init functions | Andrew Morton |
| 21:58 | Re: String literals in __init functions | Joe Perches |
| 20:13 | Re: Atomic operations and unaligned memory | Andrew MacLeod |
| 20:02 | Atomic operations and unaligned memory | Jason Merrill |
| 17:58 | Re: gcc wiki project | Mikhail Maltsev |
| 15:43 | Re: [gsoc] Generic addressing mode selection | Jeff Law |
| 15:40 | Fixing inconsistent uses of address costs | Kyrill Tkachov |
| 14:32 | Re: [gsoc] Generic addressing mode selection | Erik Varga |
| 14:15 | Re: Question about Gimple FE | Richard Biener |
| 09:21 | Re: Bugzilla vs 5.0 milestone | Richard Biener |
| 09:19 | Re: Bugzilla vs 5.0 milestone | Richard Biener |
| 09:15 | Re: Bugzilla vs 5.0 milestone | Andreas Schwab |
| 09:03 | Re: Bugzilla vs 5.0 milestone | Paolo Carlini |
| 08:52 | Re: Bugzilla vs 5.0 milestone | Jakub Jelinek |
| 08:36 | Re: Bugzilla vs 5.0 milestone | Richard Biener |
| 00:10 | Bugzilla vs 5.0 milestone | Paolo Carlini |
March 25, 2015
March 24, 2015
| 21:26 | Bug with compound literal initializer? | Alexey Neyman |
| 12:41 | Re: gcc wiki project | Jonathan Wakely |
| 12:34 | Re: gcc wiki project | Martin Jambor |
| 12:20 | Re: gcc wiki project | Jonathan Wakely |
| 12:16 | Re: gcc wiki project | Martin Jambor |
| 11:55 | Zs | Richard Allen |
| 08:43 | Re: [RFC] Dealing with ODR violations in GCC | Martin LiÅka |
March 23, 2015
March 22, 2015
| 23:47 | Re: Mirror | Gerald Pfeifer |
| 22:40 | Re: GCC 5 Status Report (2015-03-20) | Georg-Johann Lay |
| 22:36 | gcc-5-20150322 is now available | gccadmin |
| 21:10 | Re: [gsoc] Generic addressing mode selection | Oleg Endo |
| 20:21 | [gsoc] Generic addressing mode selection | Erik Varga |
| 19:12 | Re: future versions | Jack Howarth |
| 17:57 | Re: future versions | Jonathan Wakely |
| 17:28 | Re: future versions | Jack Howarth |
| 15:31 | Re: GCC 5 Status Report (2015-03-20) | Joel Sherrill |
| 07:01 | Re: [gsoc2015] Is Gimple FE eligible for gsoc this year? | Trevor Saunders |
| 06:36 | Re: [gsoc2015] Is Gimple FE eligible for gsoc this year? | xue yinsong |
March 21, 2015
| 18:30 | Re: How to implement '@' GDB-like operator for libcc1 | Jan Kratochvil |
| 17:28 | Re: future versions | Markus Trippelsdorf |
| 16:12 | Re: future versions | Jack Howarth |
| 05:45 | Re: future versions | Markus Trippelsdorf |
| 01:37 | Re: RFC: attaching functions to types | Andrew Pinski |
| 01:05 | RFC: attaching functions to types | Shawn Landden |
| 00:08 | future versions | Jack Howarth |
March 20, 2015
| 22:14 | Re: GCC 5 Status Report (2015-03-20) | Jan Hubicka |
| 18:40 | Re: ARC length attribute patch | Joern Wolfgang Rennecke |
| 16:02 | ARC length attribute patch | Claudiu Zissulescu |
| 14:48 | Re: Offloading GSOC 2015 | Kirill Yukhin |
| 12:18 | GCC 5 Status Report (2015-03-20) | Richard Biener |
| 11:14 | Re: Offloading GSOC 2015 | guray ozen |
March 19, 2015
| 22:35 | gcc-4.8-20150319 is now available | gccadmin |
| 19:00 | Re: [gomp4] Questions about "declare target" and "target update" pragmas | Jakub Jelinek |
| 18:43 | Re: [gomp4] Questions about "declare target" and "target update" pragmas | Ilya Verbin |
| 17:41 | Re: [gsoc2015] Is Gimple FE eligible for gsoc this year? | Trevor Saunders |
| 14:57 | Re: [gomp4] Questions about "declare target" and "target update" pragmas | Jakub Jelinek |
| 14:50 | Re: [gomp4] Questions about "declare target" and "target update" pragmas | Ilya Verbin |
| 13:47 | Re: [gomp4] Questions about "declare target" and "target update" pragmas | Jakub Jelinek |
| 09:08 | Re: [debug-early] emitting early debug for external variables | Richard Biener |
| 07:35 | Re: [gsoc2015] Is Gimple FE eligible for gsoc this year? | Richard Biener |
| 03:57 | Re: [gsoc2015] Is Gimple FE eligible for gsoc this year? | Trevor Saunders |
March 18, 2015
March 17, 2015
| 19:10 | Re: Unintended variable renaming in SSA replacement table | Jeff Law |
| 18:54 | Re: Unintended variable renaming in SSA replacement table | Benedikt Huber |
| 18:25 | Re: Unintended variable renaming in SSA replacement table | Jeff Law |
| 15:51 | Re: Proposal for another approach for Loop transformation with conditional in Loops. | Richard Biener |
| 14:37 | Re: Proposal for another approach for Loop transformation with conditional in Loops. | Jeff Law |
| 12:31 | Unintended variable renaming in SSA replacement table | Benedikt Huber |
| 10:00 | Re: Named parameters | David Brown |
| 03:45 | RE: Proposal for another approach for Loop transformation with conditional in Loops. | Ajit Kumar Agarwal |
March 16, 2015
March 15, 2015
March 14, 2015
| 15:22 | Examples of GCC plugins | Mikhail Maltsev |
March 13, 2015
March 12, 2015
| 23:14 | Re: inline asm clobbers | Segher Boessenkool |
| 22:35 | gcc-4.8-20150312 is now available | gccadmin |
| 22:10 | Re: inline asm clobbers | David Wohlferd |
| 21:37 | Re: inline asm clobbers | Jeff Law |
| 21:26 | Re: inline asm clobbers | Jakub Jelinek |
| 21:03 | Re: inline asm clobbers | David Wohlferd |
| 19:55 | Re: Undefined behavior due to 6.5.16.1p3 | Martin Sebor |
| 14:25 | Re: inline asm clobbers | Paul_Koning |
| 12:13 | Re: Undefined behavior due to 6.5.16.1p3 | Vincent Lefevre |
| 12:11 | Re: Undefined behavior due to 6.5.16.1p3 | Vincent Lefevre |
| 11:28 | Re: Offloading GSOC 2015 | guray ozen |
| 01:19 | Re: inline asm clobbers | Ian Lance Taylor |
| 01:05 | Re: Undefined behavior due to 6.5.16.1p3 | Joseph Myers |
| 00:53 | Re: inline asm clobbers | David Wohlferd |
| 00:52 | Re: inline asm clobbers | David Wohlferd |
| 00:04 | Re: inline asm clobbers | Ian Lance Taylor |
March 11, 2015
| 23:41 | Re: inline asm clobbers | Paul_Koning |
| 23:19 | Re: inline asm clobbers | Ian Lance Taylor |
| 23:18 | Re: Undefined behavior due to 6.5.16.1p3 | Robbert Krebbers |
| 22:58 | inline asm clobbers | David Wohlferd |
| 22:36 | gcc-4.9-20150311 is now available | gccadmin |
| 17:02 | Re: Undefined behavior due to 6.5.16.1p3 | Vincent Lefevre |
| 16:59 | Re: Undefined behavior due to 6.5.16.1p3 | Jonathan Wakely |
| 16:56 | Re: Undefined behavior due to 6.5.16.1p3 | Vincent Lefevre |
| 16:39 | Re: Undefined behavior due to 6.5.16.1p3 | Jakub Jelinek |
| 16:31 | Re: Undefined behavior due to 6.5.16.1p3 | Vincent Lefevre |
| 16:12 | Re: Undefined behavior due to 6.5.16.1p3 | Jakub Jelinek |
| 16:08 | Re: Undefined behavior due to 6.5.16.1p3 | Vincent Lefevre |
| 15:49 | Re: Undefined behavior due to 6.5.16.1p3 | Martin Sebor |
| 13:26 | Re: Undefined behavior due to 6.5.16.1p3 | Robbert Krebbers |
| 13:19 | Re: SPIR-V and GCC | Thomas Schwinge |
| 12:58 | Re: Offloading GSOC 2015 | Thomas Schwinge |
March 10, 2015
March 09, 2015
March 08, 2015
| 22:37 | gcc-5-20150308 is now available | gccadmin |
| 19:49 | Re: Proposal for path splitting for reduction in register pressure for Loops. | Jeff Law |
| 18:13 | RE: Proposal for path splitting for reduction in register pressure for Loops. | Richard Biener |
| 17:37 | Re: Proposal for path splitting for reduction in register pressure for Loops. | Jeff Law |
| 15:58 | RE: Proposal for path splitting for reduction in register pressure for Loops. | Ajit Kumar Agarwal |
| 15:35 | Re: Proposal for path splitting for reduction in register pressure for Loops. | Richard Biener |
| 14:39 | Proposal for path splitting for reduction in register pressure for Loops. | Ajit Kumar Agarwal |
| 06:46 | Proposal for inter-procedural loops fusion. | Ajit Kumar Agarwal |
March 07, 2015
| 15:41 | Re: GSoc-2015: Modular GCC | Jeff Law |
| 14:55 | Re: GSoc-2015: Modular GCC | Jeff Law |
| 14:42 | Re: GSoc-2015: Modular GCC | Pedro Alves |
| 13:20 | Data Recovery Services and Hardware Repair Services | Lance |
| 12:27 | Re: Proposal on Unrolling factor based on Data reuse. | Richard Biener |
| 10:26 | RE: Proposal on Unrolling factor based on Data reuse. | Ajit Kumar Agarwal |
| 10:01 | Proposal on Unrolling factor based on Data reuse. | Ajit Kumar Agarwal |
| 01:22 | Re: GSoc-2015: Modular GCC | Mikhail Maltsev |
March 06, 2015
| 17:13 | Re: Listing a maintainer for libcilkrts, and GCC's Cilk Plus implementation generally? | Jeff Law |
| 16:21 | Re: A bug (?) with inline functions at O0: undefined reference | Marc Glisse |
| 16:21 | Re: A bug (?) with inline functions at O0: undefined reference | Marek Polacek |
| 16:13 | A bug (?) with inline functions at O0: undefined reference | Ilya Verbin |
| 15:23 | Re: SPIR-V and GCC | BogDan |
| 14:37 | RE: Listing a maintainer for libcilkrts, and GCC's Cilk Plus implementation generally? | Zamyatin, Igor |
| 14:26 | RE: Listing a maintainer for libcilkrts, and GCC's Cilk Plus implementation generally? | Tannenbaum, Barry M |
| 01:12 | Re: GSoc-2015: Modular GCC | Trevor Saunders |
| 00:42 | Re: Listing a maintainer for libcilkrts, and GCC's Cilk Plus implementation generally? | Thomas Schwinge |
March 05, 2015
| 23:22 | bfin fails to build on 4.9 but builds on head | Joel Sherrill |
| 22:36 | gcc-4.8-20150305 is now available | gccadmin |
| 20:39 | Re: Listing a maintainer for libcilkrts, and GCC's Cilk Plus implementation generally? | Jeff Law |
| 18:52 | Re: GSoc-2015: Modular GCC | Sidharth Chaturvedi |
| 15:50 | Re: SPIR-V and GCC | David Malcolm |
| 15:46 | Re: GSoc-2015: Modular GCC | Jeff Law |
| 15:44 | [PATCH, committed] jit documentation fixes | David Malcolm |
| 11:26 | Re: SPIR-V and GCC | Xerxes Rånby |
| 10:30 | Re: GSoc-2015: Modular GCC | Trevor Saunders |
| 06:37 | Wrong function call in GCC JIT tutorial | Bert Wesarg |
| 00:13 | LRA spill/fill memory alignment question | Steve Ellcey |
March 04, 2015
| 22:36 | gcc-4.9-20150304 is now available | gccadmin |
| 19:14 | GSoc-2015: Modular GCC | Sidharth Chaturvedi |
| 17:28 | Re: MPX runtime inclusion for GCC 5 | Jeff Law |
| 16:49 | Re: SPIR-V and GCC | David Malcolm |
| 16:21 | Re: SPIR-V and GCC | BogDan |
| 16:15 | Re: please document requirements on sphinx | David Malcolm |
| 15:28 | Re: SPIR-V and GCC | David Malcolm |
| 14:36 | SPIR-V and GCC | BogDan |
| 12:36 | Re: Obscure crashes due to gcc 4.9 -O2 => -fisolate-erroneous-paths-dereference | Richard Biener |
| 08:08 | Re: string constant of the constant pool entry.. | Umesh Kalappa |
March 03, 2015
| 23:38 | Re: Obscure crashes due to gcc 4.9 -O2 => -fisolate-erroneous-paths-dereference | Jeff Law |
| 21:59 | Re: string constant of the constant pool entry.. | Richard Sandiford |
| 21:32 | Re: Restricting arguments to intrinsic functions | Daniel Santos |
| 19:57 | Re: Obscure crashes due to gcc 4.9 -O2 => -fisolate-erroneous-paths-dereference | Martin Sebor |
| 15:16 | Offloading GSOC 2015 | guray ozen |
| 10:50 | please document requirements on sphinx | Matthias Klose |
| 08:41 | Re: Obscure crashes due to gcc 4.9 -O2 => -fisolate-erroneous-paths-dereference | Chris Johns |
| 08:29 | [GSoC] Google Summer of Code 2015: GCC got accepted | Tobias Burnus |
March 02, 2015
| 17:54 | Re: Is there a way to use define_subst when operands need to change modes? | Kyrill Tkachov |
| 17:38 | Re: Is there a way to use define_subst when operands need to change modes? | Ilya Tocar |
| 15:22 | Is there a way to use define_subst when operands need to change modes? | Kyrill Tkachov |
| 11:47 | string constant of the constant pool entry.. | Umesh Kalappa |
| 11:44 | string constant of the constant pool entry.. | Umesh Kalappa |
| 07:08 | Re: loop_latch_edge is NULL during jump threading | Richard Biener |
| 04:32 | Re: loop_latch_edge is NULL during jump threading | Kugan |
| 04:29 | Re: loop_latch_edge is NULL during jump threading | Jeff Law |
March 01, 2015
| 23:32 | loop_latch_edge is NULL during jump threading | Kugan |
| 22:37 | gcc-5-20150301 is now available | gccadmin |
Indexes: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] Site Nav: [Browse other archives for this mailing list]
[Browse other mailing lists at this site]