This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: C++ Standard Question


On 23/01/15 10:53 -0600, Joel Sherrill wrote:
Is there a better way to automate a signature compliance? To tweak
what they have done?

Testing member function signatures for compliance is inherently
flawed, they just shouldn't do it.

I would say they should be testing that the function can be called on
a non-const object and that it behaves as specified, rather than
testing for a specific signature.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]