This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the GCC project.
[ping] Re: proper name of i386/x86-64/etc targets
- From: Sandra Loosemore <sandra at codesourcery dot com>
- To: <rth at redhat dot com>, <hubicka at ucw dot cz>, <ubizjak at gmail dot com>
- Cc: GCC Development <gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2015 19:26:56 -0700
- Subject: [ping] Re: proper name of i386/x86-64/etc targets
- Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
- References: <54A5E698 dot 60702 at codesourcery dot com>
On 01/01/2015 05:30 PM, Sandra Loosemore wrote:
I've noticed that the GCC user documentation is quite inconsistent about
the name(s) it uses for i386/x86-64/etc targets. invoke.texi has a
section for "i386 and x86-64 Options", but in other places the manual
uses x86, X86, i?86, i86, x86_64 (underscore instead of a dash),
I'd be happy to work on a patch to bring the manual to using a common
naming convention, but what should it be? Wikipedia seems to use "x86"
(lowercase) to refer to the entire family of architectures (including
the original 16-bit variants), "IA-32" for the 32-bit architecture (I
believe that is Intel's official name), and "x86-64" (with a dash
instead of underscore) for the 64-bit architecture. But of course the
target maintainers should have the final say on what names to use.
Ping? Any thoughts?