Re: organization of optimization options in manual

[Jeff Law <law at redhat dot com>]

On 01/14/15 23:12, Sandra Loosemore wrote:
> On 01/14/2015 08:41 PM, Jeff Law wrote:
> > With the section being ~60 pages, my first thought is we have way too
> > many options!
>
> Heh, at least we have documentation for all those options.  :-)
>
> > But that's not likely to change.  Though perhaps the
> > process will encourage some culling of options that really don't make
> > sense anymore.
>
> Would we want to remove useless options outright, or deprecate them for
> a while with removal to happen at some future time, or just deprecate
> them and/or document that they are not useful?
We typically deprecate and leave it as a nop for a major release cycle, 
then do final removal the next major release.

> I guess it can't be any worse than it is now, though, where the whole 60
> pages is essentially a "misc bucket".  I'll see if I can put together a
> plan for splitting things up....  if there are too many leftovers maybe
> others can help by suggesting different/additional categories.
Sounds good.  I think just starting with the list & creating the buckets 
with the list.  Then post here and we'll iterate and try to nail that 
down before you start moving everything in the .texi file.

jeff