This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: 404 @ https://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-5/
- From: Ed Smith-Rowland <3dw4rd at verizon dot net>
- To: Olaf van der Spek <olaf at xwis dot net>
- Cc: "gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- Date: Tue, 30 Dec 2014 10:29:33 -0500
- Subject: Re: 404 @ https://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-5/
- Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
- References: <549C3B3B dot 7030100 at xwis dot net> <CAH6eHdTkWYU6ha4KV8eibwyd_vaXrv6z1ofQtrPKDGhocRiKLQ at mail dot gmail dot com> <549F4A0D dot 20808 at xwis dot net> <CAH6eHdRr661EsTk1Tc4-u0ZK1d8wkW3iwTgiDojUV2fz-Ehp3Q at mail dot gmail dot com> <54A17471 dot 1060903 at verizon dot net> <54A29FB3 dot 7010303 at xwis dot net>
On 12/30/2014 07:50 AM, Olaf van der Spek wrote:
I should have replaced 'conformance' with 'feature completeness' in my
The words in the message indicate 'features'. The word experimental
appears in bold.
On 29-12-2014 16:34, Ed Smith-Rowland wrote:
The note about C++14 conformance is great as it stands modulo link
Why is it great to not mention the experimental qualifier?
Do all files / libraries have to be compiled with the same -std option?
If so, this option causes ABI issues by itself.
My understanding is that the C++11 ABI changes to string, list,
ios_base::failure (are there others?) that have been queued for a while
have been put into gcc5. This is the big release. There was a message
subsequent) on this.
Check https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-10/msg00268.html for
Check https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-11/msg01750.html for
I'm quite sure that once the ABI issues have been stabilized appropriate
formal announcements and documentation will appear on this subject.