This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

RE: [Aarch64] LRA


That's what I assumed.  However, can reload spill GPRs into FPRs as LRA
does?  For even after specifying -mno-lra, I still see excessive slots in
FPRs.

Thank you,

-- 
Evandro Menezes                              Austin, TX


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Richard Earnshaw [mailto:rearnsha@arm.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, November 05, 2014 11:49
> To: Evandro Menezes; gcc@gcc.gnu.org
> Subject: Re: [Aarch64] LRA
> 
> On 05/11/14 17:14, Evandro Menezes wrote:
> > It doesn't seem that the option -mno-lra does what it implies.  If so,
> > what does it do, for the it does result in differences.
> 
> It causes the compiler to use 'reload' rather than LRA for handling part
of
> the register allocation process.
> 
> R.



Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]