This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: Skipping assembler when producing slim LTO files


> On Wed, Sep 24, 2014 at 6:32 PM, Jan Hubicka <hubicka@ucw.cz> wrote:
> > Libreoffice shows that GCC needs about twice as much of system time. According
> > to profiles, good part is the ugly way we pass stuff down to assembler and
> > other part is memory use during the copmilation stage.
> 
> Are you using -pipe? AFAIR this still isn't the default, even on
> GNU/Linux, but it is typically a lot faster than without.

I use libreoffice's default flags. Will check what they do.
Given that -pipe is around for many years and works well, what about making it defualt
to justify GCC 5 release?

honza
> 
> Ciao!
> Steven


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]