This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: Skipping assembler when producing slim LTO files
- From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant at google dot com>
- To: Andi Kleen <andi at firstfloor dot org>
- Cc: Jan Hubicka <hubicka at ucw dot cz>, GCC Development <gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- Date: Wed, 24 Sep 2014 08:02:26 -0700
- Subject: Re: Skipping assembler when producing slim LTO files
- Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
- References: <20140924054651 dot GB5371 at kam dot mff dot cuni dot cz> <878ul96pnx dot fsf at tassilo dot jf dot intel dot com>
On Wed, Sep 24, 2014 at 7:47 AM, Andi Kleen <email@example.com> wrote:
> I wonder how hard it would be to fix simple-object to be able to create
> from scratch. From a quick look it would be mostly adding the right
> values into the header? That would need some defines per target.
It could be done, of course. It would mean maintaining a new set of
tables and updating them for each target. The specific table to use
would depend on the command line options. It turns into yet another
data structure to update.