This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: Fwd: Building gcc-4.9 on OpenBSD
- From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely dot gcc at gmail dot com>
- To: Ian Grant <ian dot a dot n dot grant at googlemail dot com>
- Cc: "gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org>, Tobias Ulmer <tobiasu at tmux dot org>, "marc dot glisse at inria dot fr" <marc dot glisse at inria dot fr>
- Date: Sat, 20 Sep 2014 15:21:10 +0100
- Subject: Re: Fwd: Building gcc-4.9 on OpenBSD
- Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
- References: <CAKFjmdzLbwLhYoNA3vg3LfWE_jbeq8npheNX6nGtOh--Tp-14g at mail dot gmail dot com> <CAKFjmdxKZBXXLXVqVR7pE6hmOfmF=8HdCV2gqJC6GxJ3822MMw at mail dot gmail dot com> <20140918212226 dot GA18317 at tin dot tmux dot org> <CAKFjmdxzORjCEafbKQGYXRFh5FZMY+DkYkvDUqVNU8QcCvx+fw at mail dot gmail dot com> <CAH6eHdSvvbb+kmDmqJVJ7fMuEEQ5p7DuO9Bcm7vuFrmRQEpQ6Q at mail dot gmail dot com> <CAKFjmdzfunurWmFhA6RZOOPe59giCTt58NkXAW=Mqzc690qSEQ at mail dot gmail dot com> <CAH6eHdR0kvRyaYywwPveO90WYQ-mKs7j1Lp9M3iMhDsxueY+Ow at mail dot gmail dot com> <CAKFjmdz346GoRkkWdz+K6nEaMYCq7B4iZ4rLTgmE=z60-cq=Mw at mail dot gmail dot com> <CAKFjmdxt7GhW3PNfNNEUED-TU3+eQh9j_FU_pnH47LhgrQ1AzQ at mail dot gmail dot com> <CCD865889A560649BA947E1B934A8D7DECAF1C74 at us01wembx1 dot internal dot synopsys dot com> <CAKFjmdzUOfRQu9xCRtxN1Dw9FOqh-HbKgr71C9m4X4kwuSbB0Q at mail dot gmail dot com> <001401cfd3b2$6ed27740$4c7765c0$ at arm dot com> <CAKFjmdyJ5Oi7w=DVvfzjwBgOT3wZ3X7NYaW1f9MWsf2_FseCLQ at mail dot gmail dot com> <CAH6eHdTVemHoxTQptRU-7RtNkVaGbO_2co4C3WFvBZVo4riqNQ at mail dot gmail dot com> <CAH6eHdQBKs1kH9t2CUQ+jyq+aoY85soA9mQjo1tbxBA0kYZzMg at mail dot gmail dot com> <CAKFjmdzPjbOHThJ8-h=e7GdZEw7u2yYAvVOg+M2Tr0eD9xQ9Bw at mail dot gmail dot com>
On 20 September 2014 00:52, Ian Grant wrote:
> None of this is useful to me. I'm trying to make a case for why people
> should have confidence in GNU software. You are NOT helping me in
> that, I assure you,
You seem to have already made up your mind it's GNU crap.
Being insulting is a funny way to ask for help.
> We need to publish some simple steps that people can take to reassure
> themselves that the 64MB binaries that GCC 4.9 produces on Linux
> systems are normal and nothing to worry about,
If you run strip on the binaries and they get smaller, that means the
additional space is not taken up with executable code, but optional
debug info (in the DWARF format). Unless your strip command has been
compromised too, of course.
If you're not familiar with the strip and size commands, or prepared
to use their man pages, I have to wonder what sort of case you're able
to make for having confidence in any software.
> Why is that so hard? Where are the GCC experts on this list. Where are
> the people that actually care about the reputation of the FSF?
They've probably got better things to do than engage with someone who
comes out with crap like "dangerous GNU crap".