This is the mail archive of the mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: Fwd: Building gcc-4.9 on OpenBSD

On 18 September 2014 23:46, Ian Grant wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 18, 2014 at 5:22 PM, Tobias Ulmer <> wrote:
>> On Wed, Sep 17, 2014 at 01:26:48PM -0400, Ian Grant wrote:
>>> I can compile the first stage OK, and the binaries are quite modest:
>>> -rwxr-xr-x  1 ian  ian  17.2M Sep  6 03:47 prev-gcc/cc1
>>> -rwxr-xr-x  1 ian  ian   1.2M Sep  6 04:24 prev-gcc/cpp
>>> -rwxr-xr-x  1 ian  ian   1.2M Sep  6 04:24 prev-gcc/xgcc
>> Gcc 4.9 binaries on OpenBSD/amd64 are resonable:
>> -r-xr-xr-x  1 root  bin    11.6M Sep  9 03:02 cc1
>> -r-xr-xr-x  1 root  bin    15.4M Sep  9 03:02 gnat1
>> -r-xr-xr-x  1 root  bin   749K Sep  9 03:02 ecpp
> I think we need to be able to explain this. It's an increase of over
> 60%, I wouldn't expect that to be due to the relative ineffiiciency of
> Intel instruction encoding over AMD.  And it is not due to the
> inclusion of libsylkrts (it's much easier to say "Intel library", how
> many other libraries are there in GCC that were written by Intel?)

liboffload might get added soon.

> because that is not in the stage1 bootstrap.

Are you looking at stripped binaries or unstripped?

Have you compared the binaries using size(1) instead of ls(1)?

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]