This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: Fwd: Building gcc-4.9 on OpenBSD
- From: Ian Grant <ian dot a dot n dot grant at googlemail dot com>
- To: gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Wed, 17 Sep 2014 14:35:13 -0400
- Subject: Re: Fwd: Building gcc-4.9 on OpenBSD
- Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
- References: <CAKFjmdzLbwLhYoNA3vg3LfWE_jbeq8npheNX6nGtOh--Tp-14g at mail dot gmail dot com> <CAKFjmdxKZBXXLXVqVR7pE6hmOfmF=8HdCV2gqJC6GxJ3822MMw at mail dot gmail dot com> <alpine dot DEB dot 2 dot 11 dot 1409171933230 dot 1577 at laptop-mg dot saclay dot inria dot fr>
On Wed, Sep 17, 2014 at 1:36 PM, Marc Glisse <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> On Wed, 17 Sep 2014, Ian Grant wrote:
>> And is there any way to disable the Intel library?
> --disable-libcilkrts (same as the other libs)
> If it explicitly doesn't support your system, I am a bit surprised it isn't
> disabled automatically, that seems like a bug.
Not necessarily a bug, but it would have been good if the --help
option had mentioned it. I looked, really. Perhaps I missed it though.
So many options for disabling one thing or another ....
> Please don't call it "the Intel library", that doesn't mean anything.
Doesn't it? How did you know what 'it' was then? Or is that a stupid
question? This identity concept is much slipperier than it seems at
first, isn't it?
How about my question about the size of the binaries? Is that 60+MB
what other systems show? What is the extra function 4.9 has over 4.5
to which I'm dedicating 50MB of disk? Warning messages?