This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: Help w/ PR61538?
- From: Jakub Jelinek <jakub at redhat dot com>
- To: Jeff Law <law at redhat dot com>
- Cc: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely dot gcc at gmail dot com>, Joshua Kinard <kumba at gentoo dot org>, "gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- Date: Thu, 7 Aug 2014 18:04:19 +0200
- Subject: Re: Help w/ PR61538?
- Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
- References: <53B8C5F1 dot 9060005 at gentoo dot org> <53D5CA09 dot 7020604 at gentoo dot org> <6D39441BF12EF246A7ABCE6654B0235320EB4864 at LEMAIL01 dot le dot imgtec dot org> <53D61A89 dot 8060603 at gentoo dot org> <6D39441BF12EF246A7ABCE6654B0235320EB4EEA at LEMAIL01 dot le dot imgtec dot org> <53E30F9E dot 2010509 at gentoo dot org> <CAH6eHdRjWLRR16k5D7a3=k6uV0M_akMAbuXrJO6pb7WmKoh+8A at mail dot gmail dot com> <53E3A2DA dot 3010301 at redhat dot com>
- Reply-to: Jakub Jelinek <jakub at redhat dot com>
On Thu, Aug 07, 2014 at 10:01:30AM -0600, Jeff Law wrote:
> On 08/07/14 03:16, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> >On 7 August 2014 06:33, Joshua Kinardwrote:
> >>For my own information, what's the cutoff date for fixes to regressions like
> >>this to make it into gcc-4.9.1?
> >A month ago, https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2014-07/msg00103.html
> >The GCC home page has links to the status report emails for each active branch.
> It's also useful to look at historical data. gcc-x.y.1 usually spins ~1
~2-3 months actually.
> month after the gcc-x.y release. The gcc-x.y.2 usually follows a few months
> later in the fall (Sept/Oct).