This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [GSoC] replacing op in c_expr
- From: Prathamesh Kulkarni <bilbotheelffriend at gmail dot com>
- To: Richard Biener <richard dot guenther at gmail dot com>
- Cc: Diego Novillo <dnovillo at google dot com>, gcc <gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org>, Maxim Kuvyrkov <maxim dot kuvyrkov at linaro dot org>
- Date: Sun, 3 Aug 2014 22:28:31 +0530
- Subject: Re: [GSoC] replacing op in c_expr
- Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
- References: <CAJXstsDCU-8k_oV7VPUfg2BEE_bpTPzCxVeynJ1mVE1q5SkOCQ at mail dot gmail dot com> <CAFiYyc2N+wJYDgNdsXjFDOghp0tDLuW4gwA67domeCv7i9xP3g at mail dot gmail dot com>
On Tue, Jul 29, 2014 at 4:29 PM, Richard Biener
<richard.guenther@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 28, 2014 at 10:02 PM, Prathamesh Kulkarni
> <bilbotheelffriend@gmail.com> wrote:
>> I am having few issues replacing op in c_expr.
>> I thought of following possibilities:
>>
>> a) create a new vec<cpp_token> vector new_code.
>> for each token in code
>> {
>> if token.type is not CPP_NAME
>> new_code.safe_push (token);
>> else
>> {
>> cpp_token new_token =
>> ??? create new token of type CPP_NAME
>> with contents as name of operator ???
>> }
>> }
>>
>> I tried to go this way, but am stuck with creating a new token type.
>> i started by:
>> cpp_token new_token = token; // get same attrs as token.
>> CPP_HASHNODE (new_token.val.node.node)->ident.str = name of operator.
>> CPP_HASHNODE (new_token.val.node.node)->ident.len = len of operator name.
>> name of operator is obtained from opers[i] in parse_for.
>>
>> however this does not work because I guess
>> new_token = token, shallow copies
>> the token (default assignment operator, i didn't find an overloaded version).
>>
>> b) create new struct c_expr_elem and use
>> vec<c_expr_elem> code, instead of vec<cpp_token> code;
>>
>> sth like:
>> struct c_expr_elem
>> {
>> enum c_expr_elem_type { ID, TOKEN };
>> enum c_expr_elem_type type;
>>
>> union {
>> cpp_token token;
>> const char *id;
>> };
>> };
>>
>> while replacing op, compare token with op, and if it matches,
>> create a new c_expr_elem with type = ID, and id = name of operator.
>> This shall probably work, but shall require many changes to other parts
>> since we change c_expr::code.
>>
>> I would like to hear any other suggestions.
>
> Together with the vector of tokens recorded at parse_c_expr time
> record a vector of token mappings (op -> plus, op2 -> ...) and do
> the replacement at code-generation time where we also special-case
> captures.
>
> Yeah, it's a but unfortunate that c_expr parsing is done the way it
> is done....
Thanks. I guess we would require a multi-map for this since there can
be many operators
(op -> [plus, minus], op2 -> [negate]) ?
Unfortunately, I somehow seem to have missed your response and ended up with a
hackish way of doing it, although it works. I will soon change that to
use token mappings.
I mostly followed b), except i made it sub-class of cpp_token, so the
other code using c_expr::code
(outline_c_expr, c_expr::gen_transform) did not require changes except
for special-casing op.
* genmatch.c (c_expr::elem): New struct.
(c_expr::code): Change type to vec<c_expr::elem>.
(replace_op_in_c_expr): New function.
(c_expr::gen_transform): Adjust to changes in c_expr.
(outline_c_expr): Likewise.
(parse_c_expr): Likewise.
(parse_for): Call replace_op_in_c_expr.
Thanks,
Prathamesh
>
> Richard.
>
>> Thanks,
>> Prathamesh.
Index: genmatch.c
===================================================================
--- genmatch.c (revision 213343)
+++ genmatch.c (working copy)
@@ -238,11 +238,20 @@ struct expr : public operand
struct c_expr : public operand
{
- c_expr (cpp_reader *r_, vec<cpp_token> code_, unsigned nr_stmts_)
+ struct elem: public cpp_token
+ {
+ enum elem_type { TOKEN, ID };
+ enum elem_type type;
+ const char *id;
+
+ elem (enum elem_type type_ = TOKEN, const char *id_ = 0): type (type_), id (id_) {}
+ };
+
+ c_expr (cpp_reader *r_, vec<elem> code_, unsigned nr_stmts_)
: operand (OP_C_EXPR), r (r_), code (code_),
nr_stmts (nr_stmts_), fname (NULL) {}
cpp_reader *r;
- vec<cpp_token> code;
+ vec<elem> code;
unsigned nr_stmts;
char *fname;
virtual void gen_transform (FILE *f, const char *, bool);
@@ -641,6 +650,31 @@ replace_id (operand *o, const char *user
return ne;
}
+
+operand *
+replace_op_in_c_expr (operand *o, const char *user_id, const char *oper)
+{
+ gcc_assert (is_a<c_expr *> (o));
+ c_expr *ce = as_a<c_expr *> (o);
+
+ vec<c_expr::elem> code = vNULL;
+
+ for (unsigned i = 0; i < ce->code.length (); ++i)
+ {
+ cpp_token token = ce->code[i];
+ if (token.type == CPP_NAME
+ && strcmp ((const char *) NODE_NAME (token.val.node.node), user_id) == 0)
+ {
+ e_operation operation (oper);
+ c_expr::elem elm (c_expr::elem::ID, operation.op->id);
+ code.safe_push (elm);
+ }
+ else
+ code.safe_push (ce->code[i]);
+ }
+
+ return new c_expr (ce->r, code, ce->nr_stmts);
+}
void
check_no_user_id (operand *o)
@@ -742,6 +776,11 @@ c_expr::gen_transform (FILE *f, const ch
for (unsigned i = 0; i < code.length (); ++i)
{
+ if (code[i].type == elem::ID)
+ {
+ fputs (code[i].id, f);
+ continue;
+ }
const cpp_token *token = &code[i];
/* Replace captures for code-gen. */
@@ -1717,6 +1756,11 @@ outline_c_exprs (FILE *f, struct operand
unsigned stmt_nr = 1;
for (unsigned i = 0; i < e->code.length (); ++i)
{
+ if (e->code[i].type == c_expr::elem::ID)
+ {
+ fputs (e->code[i].id, f);
+ continue;
+ }
const cpp_token *token = &e->code[i];
/* Replace captures for code-gen. */
@@ -1972,7 +2016,7 @@ parse_c_expr (cpp_reader *r, cpp_ttype s
const cpp_token *token;
cpp_ttype end;
unsigned opencnt;
- vec<cpp_token> code = vNULL;
+ vec<c_expr::elem> code = vNULL;
unsigned nr_stmts = 0;
eat_token (r, start);
if (start == CPP_OPEN_PAREN)
@@ -1997,7 +2041,7 @@ parse_c_expr (cpp_reader *r, cpp_ttype s
nr_stmts++;
/* Record the token. */
- code.safe_push (*token);
+ code.safe_push (*(c_expr::elem *) token);
}
while (1);
return new c_expr (r, code, nr_stmts);
@@ -2134,10 +2178,20 @@ parse_for (cpp_reader *r, source_locatio
{
simplify *s = for_simplifiers[j];
operand *match_op = replace_id (s->match, user_id, opers[i]);
- operand *result_op = replace_id (s->result, user_id, opers[i]);
+
+ operand *result_op;
+ if (is_a<c_expr *> (s->result))
+ result_op = replace_op_in_c_expr (s->result, user_id, opers[i]);
+ else
+ result_op = replace_id (s->result, user_id, opers[i]);
+
+
+ vec<operand *> ifexpr_vec = vNULL;
+ for (unsigned k = 0; k < s->ifexpr_vec.length (); ++k)
+ ifexpr_vec.safe_push (replace_op_in_c_expr (s->ifexpr_vec[k], user_id, opers[i]));
simplify *ns = new simplify (s->name, match_op, s->match_location,
- result_op, s->result_location, s->ifexpr_vec);
+ result_op, s->result_location, ifexpr_vec);
simplifiers.safe_push (ns);
}