This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: GCC version bikeshedding
- From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely dot gcc at gmail dot com>
- To: Eric Botcazou <ebotcazou at libertysurf dot fr>
- Cc: Andreas Schwab <schwab at linux-m68k dot org>, Ian Lance Taylor <iant at google dot com>, "gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org>, Jason Merrill <jason at redhat dot com>, Jakub Jelinek <jakub at redhat dot com>, Richard Biener <richard dot guenther at gmail dot com>
- Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2014 01:00:59 +0100
- Subject: Re: GCC version bikeshedding
- Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
- References: <20140720165506 dot GT3003 at laptop dot redhat dot com> <201407292258 dot 29357 dot ebotcazou at libertysurf dot fr> <CAH6eHdR3dfbYin1LMWrSUJLsk7=iO6+orQXQmXdGRxzA71MKaA at mail dot gmail dot com> <201407310018 dot 05575 dot ebotcazou at libertysurf dot fr>
On 30 July 2014 23:18, Eric Botcazou wrote:
>> What are you objecting to, calling the next release from trunk 5.0,
>> and the next one after that 6.0? Or the wording chosen to describe the
>> new versioning scheme?
> Let's not start another subthread, please, this will be even more confusing.
I'm not. I'm trying to get your message back on topic.
> You can reply to my reply to Ian's message if you deem it necessary.
Are you objecting to the numbering scheme, or Ian's description of it?
If you have an objection to the concrete plan it would be nice if you
stated clearly what it is.