This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: missing symbols in libstdc++.so.6 built from the 4.9 branch
- From: John David Anglin <dave dot anglin at bell dot net>
- To: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely dot gcc at gmail dot com>
- Cc: Matthias Klose <doko at ubuntu dot com>, "libstdc++ at gcc dot gnu dot org" <libstdc++ at gcc dot gnu dot org>, gcc Development <gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org>, Ramana Radhakrishnan <ramana dot radhakrishnan at arm dot com>, Richard Earnshaw <Richard dot Earnshaw at arm dot com>, Aurelien Jarno <aurel32 at debian dot org>
- Date: Tue, 1 Jul 2014 15:58:33 -0400
- Subject: Re: missing symbols in libstdc++.so.6 built from the 4.9 branch
- Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
- References: <53B273E6 dot 8040402 at ubuntu dot com> <CAH6eHdRQt13=pQesbAOwOVVYuuQQw=rD-cWC0+Ugv7ndDBJ+3w at mail dot gmail dot com>
On 1-Jul-14, at 5:32 AM, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On 1 July 2014 09:40, Matthias Klose wrote:
- HPPA (build log ), is missing all the future_base symbols and
exception_ptr13exception symbols, current_exception and
This implies ATOMIC_INT_LOCK_FREE <= 1 for that target. Our future and
exception_ptr implementations rely on usable atomics.
ARM and HPPA use kernel assisted libraries for atomic support. Not
lock free, but possibly good enough...
Currently, c-cppbuiltin.c doesn't provide proper defines for this
currently define __GCC_HAVE_SYNC_COMPARE_AND_SWAP_4, etc, in
pa-linux.h. I'll experiment with defining ATOMIC_INT_LOCK_FREE there.
John David Anglin email@example.com