This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: use of sphinx/rest as source for GNAT doc
- From: Florian Weimer <fweimer at redhat dot com>
- To: Arnaud Charlet <charlet at adacore dot com>, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Fri, 23 May 2014 20:30:25 +0200
- Subject: Re: use of sphinx/rest as source for GNAT doc
- Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
- References: <20140523152346 dot GA14154 at adacore dot com>
On 05/23/2014 05:23 PM, Arnaud Charlet wrote:
- the GNAT doc source would be in rest format (.rst files) instead
of texinfo (.texi files)
What about the preprocessor for the VMS specifics? Will it go away?
- we would still provide .texi files, generated automatically by the
sphinx toolset (via 'make texinfo') and committed in the repository
(similarly to configure vs configure.in/aclocal.m4), so end users
would not have any extra dependency, and generation of documentation
would still be possible from the .texi files directly
How stable is the output from Sphinx across versions? Will this
potentially cause a lot of update churn?
--
Florian Weimer / Red Hat Product Security Team