This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: New C++ IPA fails


I did -- but very likely there was a process error in my side. Will
fix them soon.

David

On Thu, May 22, 2014 at 2:12 AM, Richard Biener
<richard.guenther@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, May 22, 2014 at 10:49 AM, Paolo Carlini
> <paolo.carlini@oracle.com> wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> is somebody already working on the regressions which appeared yesterday,
>> see:
>
> David, did you forget to run the testsuite?
>
> Richard.
>
>>   https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2014-05/msg01920.html
>>
>> ie:
>>
>> FAIL: g++.dg/ipa/devirt-15.C -std=gnu++98  scan-ipa-dump devirt
>> "Speculatively devirtualizing call"
>> FAIL: g++.dg/ipa/devirt-15.C -std=gnu++11  scan-ipa-dump devirt
>> "Speculatively devirtualizing call"
>> FAIL: g++.dg/ipa/devirt-15.C -std=gnu++1y  scan-ipa-dump devirt
>> "Speculatively devirtualizing call"
>> FAIL: g++.dg/ipa/devirt-16.C -std=gnu++98  scan-ipa-dump whole-program
>> "Devirtualizing"
>> FAIL: g++.dg/ipa/devirt-16.C -std=gnu++11  scan-ipa-dump whole-program
>> "Devirtualizing"
>> FAIL: g++.dg/ipa/devirt-16.C -std=gnu++1y  scan-ipa-dump whole-program
>> "Devirtualizing"
>> FAIL: g++.dg/ipa/devirt-17.C -std=gnu++98  scan-ipa-dump whole-program
>> "Devirtualizing"
>> FAIL: g++.dg/ipa/devirt-17.C -std=gnu++11  scan-ipa-dump whole-program
>> "Devirtualizing"
>> FAIL: g++.dg/ipa/devirt-17.C -std=gnu++1y  scan-ipa-dump whole-program
>> "Devirtualizing"
>> FAIL: g++.dg/ipa/devirt-26.C -std=gnu++98  scan-ipa-dump devirt
>> "Speculatively devirtualizing"
>> FAIL: g++.dg/ipa/devirt-26.C -std=gnu++11  scan-ipa-dump devirt
>> "Speculatively devirtualizing"
>> FAIL: g++.dg/ipa/devirt-26.C -std=gnu++1y  scan-ipa-dump devirt
>> "Speculatively devirtualizing"
>> FAIL: g++.dg/ipa/imm-devirt-1.C -std=gnu++98  scan-tree-dump fre1 "Replacing
>> call target with foo"
>> FAIL: g++.dg/ipa/imm-devirt-1.C -std=gnu++11  scan-tree-dump fre1 "Replacing
>> call target with foo"
>> FAIL: g++.dg/ipa/imm-devirt-1.C -std=gnu++1y  scan-tree-dump fre1 "Replacing
>> call target with foo"
>> FAIL: g++.dg/ipa/imm-devirt-2.C -std=gnu++98  scan-tree-dump fre1 "Replacing
>> call target"
>> FAIL: g++.dg/ipa/imm-devirt-2.C -std=gnu++11  scan-tree-dump fre1 "Replacing
>> call target"
>> FAIL: g++.dg/ipa/imm-devirt-2.C -std=gnu++1y  scan-tree-dump fre1 "Replacing
>> call target"
>> FAIL: g++.dg/tree-ssa/pr8781.C -std=gnu++98  scan-tree-dump fre1 "Replacing
>> call target with f"
>> FAIL: g++.dg/tree-ssa/pr8781.C -std=gnu++11  scan-tree-dump fre1 "Replacing
>> call target with f"
>> FAIL: g++.dg/tree-ssa/pr8781.C -std=gnu++1y  scan-tree-dump fre1 "Replacing
>> call target with f"
>>
>>
>> Thanks!
>> Paolo.
>>
>> PS: by the way, I have been also seeing the same guality fails that H.J.
>> sees:
>>
>> FAIL: g++.dg/guality/pr55665.C  -O2  line 23 p == 40
>> FAIL: g++.dg/guality/pr55665.C  -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer  line 23 p == 40
>> FAIL: g++.dg/guality/pr55665.C  -O3 -g  line 23 p == 40
>>
>> but these are very old, XFAIL maybe?!?
>>
>>


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]