This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [GSoC] How to get started with the isl code generation
- From: Tobias Grosser <tobias at grosser dot es>
- To: Roman Gareev <gareevroman at gmail dot com>
- Cc: Mircea Namolaru <mircea dot namolaru at inria dot fr>, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Mon, 12 May 2014 20:43:57 +0200
- Subject: Re: [GSoC] How to get started with the isl code generation
- Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
- References: <CABGF_gfsbEmL7FODBF9dmLMFFtRbpqBk3Nm54P9e0WOYS1bGSw at mail dot gmail dot com> <535DF1DE dot 1040900 at grosser dot es> <CABGF_geWXxS6-nbj6CTp4VxDrC15PDrcLE08dgL4AY6YYFgjVA at mail dot gmail dot com> <53688B44 dot 6040509 at grosser dot es> <CABGF_gcuatzbamz1zjmqRi73_TcRxbjWd-oM1c7BJ1ySzDoyEQ at mail dot gmail dot com>
On 12/05/2014 20:35, Roman Gareev wrote:
thank you for your advice!
On the other side, I think it is a good idea to simultaneously keep track of
the design you have in mind and the first steps you are planning to take.
Even though the full design may still need some time,
some basic decisions can probably already be taken and maybe even
implemented. Staying in some way close to the coding you will do,
may be helpful to direct your code inspections to areas of code that
will be important for your implementation.
E.g. just setting up a second code generation in parallel that does
minimal work (generates no code at all), but that can be enabled by a
command line flag might be a first start.
I agree with this. I'll start setting up a second code generation as
soon as I achieve success with separate ISL AST generation.
what is the difference you see between ISL AST generation and code
What are your plans to separate the ISL AST generation? Do you foresee