This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: Rename unwind.h to unwind-gcc.h
- From: John Marino <gnugcc at marino dot st>
- To: Ian Lance Taylor <iant at google dot com>, Douglas B Rupp <rupp at adacore dot com>
- Cc: GCC Development <gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2014 09:01:32 +0200
- Subject: Re: Rename unwind.h to unwind-gcc.h
- Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
- References: <534C168F dot 8060400 at adacore dot com> <CAKOQZ8wOqyJp1dEDJAOcZfrq7y2OKtjNsZ8KyUstTYK5Y769gQ at mail dot gmail dot com> <534D1BD1 dot 1080100 at adacore dot com> <CAKOQZ8zQNrvYqJAWE6eRPY_O7K517F5MxW8Ttx+UpCVRtZVGng at mail dot gmail dot com>
On 4/16/2014 03:22, Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 15, 2014 at 4:45 AM, Douglas B Rupp <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
>> On 04/14/2014 02:01 PM, Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
>> No I considered that but I think that number will be very small. Will you
>> concede, in hindsight, that it would be better had the name been chosen to
>> be more unique?
> No, I won't concede that. The unwind.h file provides the interface
> for the C++ exception handling interface
> (http://mentorembedded.github.io/cxx-abi/abi-eh.html). That interface
> is implemented by several different compilers, not just GCC.
The header can provide the exact same interface with a different, better
He's basically asking, "If you had it to do all over again, would you
still call it unwind.h or would you call it something different?"
It's just an academic discussion because answering yes or no changes
nothing, but I think the majority of the people would give it a
different file name if they could do it all over again. It's not a big