This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [RL78] Questions about code-generation
- From: DJ Delorie <dj at redhat dot com>
- To: Oleg Endo <oleg dot endo at t-online dot de>
- Cc: peper03 at yahoo dot com, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Sun, 16 Mar 2014 17:34:01 -0400
- Subject: Re: [RL78] Questions about code-generation
- Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
- References: <1394465260 dot 82407 dot YahooMailNeo at web125603 dot mail dot ne1 dot yahoo dot com> <201403102137 dot s2ALbDMw016198 at greed dot delorie dot com> <5325F1E6 dot 4000905 at yahoo dot com> <1395003725 dot 32258 dot 454 dot camel at yam-132-YW-E178-FTW> <201403162122 dot s2GLMscD029120 at greed dot delorie dot com> <1395005273 dot 32258 dot 458 dot camel at yam-132-YW-E178-FTW>
> Maybe we should add a target hook/macro to control this to avoid
> duplicated code of 'general_operand' in various places?
Even in the msp430, not all patterns can be safely used with volatile
MEMs (i.e. the macro patterns). So, not all general_operand's were
replaced.