This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: Four times faster printf %e
- From: Povilas Kanapickas <povilas at radix dot lt>
- To: "gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- Date: Mon, 06 Jan 2014 23:19:52 +0200
- Subject: Re: Four times faster printf %e
- Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
- References: <52CB1814 dot 5050106 at radix dot lt> <CAH6eHdTt26+EggdJug552NxZOPn7AbOEJ6pNJHGQxDNBrT+OJg at mail dot gmail dot com>
On 01/06/2014 11:04 PM, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> On 6 January 2014 20:54, Povilas Kanapickas wrote:
>>
>> I have a proof-of-concept implementation of floating-point printf()
>> which is 4 to 6 times faster than the glibc printf() in common use cases
>> while producing exactly the same output (including rounding, etc.). I
>> would like to contribute it to stdlibc++ as an implementation of
>> floating-point num_put facet.
>
> Thanks for your interest in contributing to libstdc++ (N.B. it's not
> called stdlibc++!)
>
> The project has its own mailing list at libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org so if
> you want to reach the maintainers you should discuss it on that list.
> If you want to contribute then the first step is to read
> http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/libstdc++/manual/appendix_contributing.html
> in particular the legal prerequisites.
>
Thanks, I've sent the same email (modulo the stdlibc++ issue :-) ) to
the libstdc++ list.
Regards,
Povilas