This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: proposal to make SIZE_TYPE more flexible
- From: "Joseph S. Myers" <joseph at codesourcery dot com>
- To: DJ Delorie <dj at redhat dot com>
- Cc: <richard dot guenther at gmail dot com>, <gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- Date: Sat, 21 Dec 2013 01:00:58 +0000
- Subject: Re: proposal to make SIZE_TYPE more flexible
- Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
- References: <201310300422 dot r9U4M6Mx002568 at greed dot delorie dot com> <Pine dot LNX dot 4 dot 64 dot 1311161211240 dot 32731 at digraph dot polyomino dot org dot uk> <201311212241 dot rALMf15B028014 at greed dot delorie dot com> <Pine dot LNX dot 4 dot 64 dot 1311212258320 dot 26755 at digraph dot polyomino dot org dot uk> <201311220828 dot rAM8Ss0q011135 at greed dot delorie dot com> <Pine dot LNX dot 4 dot 64 dot 1311221231510 dot 5029 at digraph dot polyomino dot org dot uk> <201311221933 dot rAMJXDUt031382 at greed dot delorie dot com> <Pine dot LNX dot 4 dot 64 dot 1311222046100 dot 12354 at digraph dot polyomino dot org dot uk> <201311222118 dot rAMLIxag003002 at greed dot delorie dot com> <Pine dot LNX dot 4 dot 64 dot 1311230039030 dot 12354 at digraph dot polyomino dot org dot uk> <201312100334 dot rBA3YwMq017441 at greed dot delorie dot com> <Pine dot LNX dot 4 dot 64 dot 1312101709200 dot 15324 at digraph dot polyomino dot org dot uk> <201312201947 dot rBKJlgKS003922 at greed dot delorie dot com> <Pine dot LNX dot 4 dot 64 dot 1312202151510 dot 29339 at digraph dot polyomino dot org dot uk> <201312202159 dot rBKLxmIZ007173 at greed dot delorie dot com> <Pine dot LNX dot 4 dot 64 dot 1312202215280 dot 29339 at digraph dot polyomino dot org dot uk> <201312202240 dot rBKMeVfM008400 at greed dot delorie dot com>
On Fri, 20 Dec 2013, DJ Delorie wrote:
> Ok, so I've got it checking for existing types and checking the target
> for supported modes. Any other features, or is it time for a second
> patch? Should I cut out the __int128 parts yet, or do you just want
> to see the new code still?
I think a patch is more useful once believe feature-complete, which means
replacing the __int128 support with the new mechanism.
--
Joseph S. Myers
joseph@codesourcery.com