This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

post_inc mem in parallel rtx


Hi,

I encountered a bug in cselib.c:2360 using gnat7.1.2 (gcc4.7.3) 

        /* The register should have been invalidated.  */
          gcc_assert (REG_VALUES (dreg)->elt == 0);                <<== assert(false)


I investigated the dump and found that the crash occurred during 207r.dse2 pass.

Here is what I saw in the previous dump (206r.pro_and_epilogue) :

(insn 104 47 105 7 (parallel [
            (set (reg:CC_NOOV 56 $CCI)
                (compare:CC_NOOV (minus:SI (reg/f:SI 22 $R6 [orig:133 D.3274 ] [133])
                        (mem/f:SI (post_inc:SI (reg:SI 2 $R2 [orig:140 ivtmp.363 ] [140])) [0 MEM[base: D.4517_59, offset: 0B]+0 S4 A32]))
                    (const_int 0 [0])))
            (set (reg:SI 16 $R0 [153])
                (minus:SI (reg/f:SI 22 $R6 [orig:133 D.3274 ] [133])
                    (mem/f:SI (post_inc:SI (reg:SI 2 $R2 [orig:140 ivtmp.363 ] [140])) [0 MEM[base: D.4517_59, offset: 0B]+0 S4 A32])))
        ])

Note the post_inc MEM on $R2 appearing twice

This rtl match my pattern (predicate and contraint ok) below :

(define_insn "subsi3_compare0"
  [(set (reg:CC_NOOV CCI_REG)
        (compare:CC_NOOV
          (minus:SI 
            (match_operand:SI 1 "general_operand" "g")
            (match_operand:SI 2 " general_operand " " g"))
          (const_int 0)))
   (set (match_operand:SI 0 "register_operand" "=r ")
        (minus:SI
          (match_dup 1)
          (match_dup 2)))]

But I think It may be an error to authorize post_inc MEM in this parallel rtx in operand 1 & 2. 
When I put a more restrictive constraint which forbid the use of post_inc, the crash in cselib.c disappear.

Question : What does GCC understand when the md describes a pattern allowing the same post_inc MEM in 2 slot of a parallel rtx ?
Is it forbidden ? the MEM address is supposed to be incremented twice ?

Regards,

Selim


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]