This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: Bootstrap issues in libsanitizer
- From: Richard Biener <richard dot guenther at gmail dot com>
- To: "Gopalasubramanian, Ganesh" <Ganesh dot Gopalasubramanian at amd dot com>
- Cc: "Iyer, Balaji V" <balaji dot v dot iyer at intel dot com>, "gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org>, "konstantin dot s dot serebryany at gmail dot com" <konstantin dot s dot serebryany at gmail dot com>, Jonathan Wakely <jwakely dot gcc at gmail dot com>
- Date: Wed, 6 Nov 2013 11:55:05 +0100
- Subject: Re: Bootstrap issues in libsanitizer
- Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
- References: <BF230D13CA30DD48930C31D4099330003A49B0E1 at FMSMSX101 dot amr dot corp dot intel dot com> <CAH6eHdScLvmgh_ArORKqmtJo5XzbGCEW-Ln03uYG7KvVF_B01g at mail dot gmail dot com> <CAH6eHdRbzuYnF0mK3d1vOZboV7RW3Fzf=VGo4wUFAANjx70gsg at mail dot gmail dot com> <CAH6eHdRke4np4zdLfGRv56sVWzJRJ1LcOWnj6=i-OhnUEF5ZOQ at mail dot gmail dot com> <CAFiYyc1_1_4pAQxYrmGrTddu+XV+Gmv=0rq3kxMYCJr=HNBccw at mail dot gmail dot com> <EB4625145972F94C9680D8CADD6516155C2435AE at SATLEXDAG02 dot amd dot com>
On Wed, Nov 6, 2013 at 11:50 AM, Gopalasubramanian, Ganesh
<Ganesh.Gopalasubramanian@amd.com> wrote:
>> Are you including linux/vt.h yourself? If you get it via a glibc header then it's a SUSE issue, yes. Can you specify the SUSE version you are looking at? Even for 12.1 I see 'newev' here though SLE11 seems to have 'new'.
>
> I get the error with
>
> SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 11 (x86_64)
> VERSION = 11
> PATCHLEVEL = 1
I've filed a bugreport internally. And yes, sys/vt.h just includes
linux/vt.h here.
Richard.
> Regards
> Ganesh
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org [mailto:gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org] On Behalf Of Richard Biener
> Sent: Wednesday, November 06, 2013 4:16 PM
> To: Jonathan Wakely
> Cc: Iyer, Balaji V; gcc@gcc.gnu.org; konstantin.s.serebryany@gmail.com
> Subject: Re: Bootstrap issues in libsanitizer
>
> On Tue, Nov 5, 2013 at 4:41 PM, Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On 5 November 2013 15:38, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
>>> On 5 November 2013 15:32, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
>>>> On 5 November 2013 15:27, Iyer, Balaji V wrote:
>>>>> In file included from /usr/include/sys/vt.h:1:0,
>>>>> from ../../../../trunk-gcc/libsanitizer/sanitizer_common/sanitizer_platform_limits_posix.cc:49:
>>>>> /usr/include/linux/vt.h:74:15: error: expected unqualified-id before ânewâ
>>>>> unsigned int new; /* New console (if changing) */
>>>>> ^
>>>>
>>>> 'new' is a keyword in C++, so your linux/vt.h header is not usable in C++ files.
>>>>
>>>> This is not a problem in libsanitizer. Have you recently updated a
>>>> kernel-headers package on your machine?
>>>
>>> With kernel 3.11.6 I see that field is called newev, so it looks as
>>> though newer kernels fix the problem.
>>
>> http://lkml.indiana.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/0911.2/01720.html
>> implies the "new" field never made it into an actual release, so it
>> might be a problem for SuSE kernels only.
>
> Are you including linux/vt.h yourself? If you get it via a glibc header then it's a SUSE issue, yes. Can you specify the SUSE version you are looking at? Even for 12.1 I see 'newev' here though SLE11 seems to have 'new'.
>
> Richard.
>
>