This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

ssa-pre-21.c / PRE for truncated indices


I see that gcc.dg/tree-ssa/ssa-pre-21.c fails for avr.
The computation of k + 1L is done as unsigned int (16 bit),
but later ++k is performed as unsigned long (32 bit), and thus
array[k+1] is not re-used.

Is this to be considered a big in the optimizers for not
optimizing this, or in the testsuite for insisting that it
should be?

FWIW, equivalent behaviour can be seen natively on
i686-pc-linux-gnu by replacing "long" with "long long",
as shown in the attachment.
/* { dg-do compile } */
/* { dg-options "-O2 -fdump-tree-pre" } */

long long
NumSift (long long *array, unsigned long long k)
{
  if (array[k] < array[k + 1LL])
    ++k;
  return array[k];
}

/* There should be only two loads left.  */

/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "= \\\*\[^\n;\]*;" 2 "pre" } } */
/* { dg-final { cleanup-tree-dump "pre" } } */

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]