This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: fatal error: gnu/stubs-32.h: No such file
- From: Andrew Haley <aph at redhat dot com>
- To: David Starner <prosfilaes at gmail dot com>
- Cc: Bruce Korb <bruce dot korb at gmail dot com>, FX <fxcoudert at gmail dot com>, "gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org>, "jwakely dot gcc at gmail dot com" <jwakely dot gcc at gmail dot com>
- Date: Tue, 30 Jul 2013 15:33:54 +0100
- Subject: Re: fatal error: gnu/stubs-32.h: No such file
- References: <AA0A6252-438B-49DB-BDF6-0544CA1330BD at gmail dot com> <EDC179F1-805F-4D73-82AF-D4051A28A0E8 at gmail dot com> <51F66CA9 dot 4040803 at redhat dot com> <CAKRnqNKC=3a54YN+0kVNS8XQReey0etkFkUXC8F0M47K1F2=Sw at mail dot gmail dot com> <51F67A08 dot 2070709 at redhat dot com> <CAMZ=zj7s1D3fnS-ECeGLLTBk_FwxcXhj-3L3AmMv_HeMyDyUkw at mail dot gmail dot com> <51F7719B dot 9050502 at redhat dot com> <CAMZ=zj5kP=A2uoZpQ2ALQpadcjvnd8ZTyGTb6cP25e4UdZh97g at mail dot gmail dot com>
On 07/30/2013 01:52 PM, David Starner wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 12:56 AM, Andrew Haley <aph@redhat.com> wrote:
>> "We" is the GCC community. "We" really want multilibs to be built so
>> they get tested as much as possible. It's in the best interest of
>> all GCC users that this happens.
>
> "We" really want Ada to be built so that it gets tested as much as
> possible. "We" really want ARM to be built so that it gets tested as
> much as possible. I don't see the distinction. Those who need
> multilibs support should be responsible for making sure that it works
> right. Presumably enough people do need it. Those that don't should
> have to shoulder the burden for those who do.
The burden of typing "--disable-multilib".
>> So don't write one. Then you're likely to be proved right.
>
> So what you're saying is that "we" don't care if people can easily
> build "our" compiler.
No. I'm saying that you care enough to argue but not enough to write
a patch. If you really wanted to change the status quo that's what
you'd have done by now.
Andrew.