This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: return statement in a function with the naked attribute
- From: reed kotler <rkotler at mips dot com>
- To: Ian Lance Taylor <iant at google dot com>
- Cc: <gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org>, <rdsandiford at googlemail dot com>
- Date: Thu, 2 May 2013 20:59:22 -0700
- Subject: Re: return statement in a function with the naked attribute
- References: <5182EC4D dot 4070207 at mips dot com> <CAKOQZ8wgXQfgpu9kv74c2orXMQw-jVczARicMhXMOgQpyaBNpg at mail dot gmail dot com>
On 05/02/2013 07:54 PM, Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
On Thu, May 2, 2013 at 3:44 PM, reed kotler <rkotler@mips.com> wrote:
Should a return statement be emitted in a function that has the naked
attribute.
I vote yes.
why would you want that? naked functions are just inline asm.
you can generate your own return statement.
I meant to end that statement with a question mark. :)
There seems to be some confusion here and apparently disagreement between
various
gcc compilers.
Which targets do not generate a return instruction for a naked function?
I don't think that any that support naked functions emit a return
instruction.
Ian