This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: Intentional or accidental backward-incompatibility w.r.t. process attributes?
- From: Thorsten Glaser <tg at mirbsd dot de>
- To: gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Thu, 4 Apr 2013 09:23:53 +0000 (UTC)
- Subject: Re: Intentional or accidental backward-incompatibility w.r.t. process attributes?
- References: <515CE906 dot 2020608 at gmail dot com> <CAF1jjLtZMDv8jrAGttS=RT_phcqR=UdFxgiHxZo0cx5va4m9sQ at mail dot gmail dot com>
NightStrike <nightstrike <at> gmail.com> writes:
> > ... used to work, with the attribute from the declaration being applied also
> > to the definition.
I stumbled upon this as well recently.
> Someone else just asked not too long ago:
>
> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-help/2013-03/msg00012.html
Yes, but thereâs no solution to the question of whether this was
deliberate (and, if so, why).
bye,
//mirabilos