This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: SPEC2000 comparison of LLVM-3.2 and coming GCC4.8 on x86/x86-64


On 02/07/2013 01:51 PM, Duncan Sands wrote:
Hi Vladimir, thanks for these numbers.

...
   Therefore I had to use *Dragonegg* (a GCC plugin which uses LLVM
   backend instead of GCC backend) for generation of Fortran benchmarks
   by LLVM.
...
   I believe such progress is achieved mostly because of a *new RA*
   introduced in LLVM 3.0 and *auto-vectorization*.

I don't think it can be auto-vectorization, because I forgot to turn on the
LLVM auto-vectorizer in dragonegg-3.2 (oops!).


Thanks for pointing this out. I'll correct this.

I checked it is not switched on for CLANG too. As I understand this stuff is experimental. I see on my small benchmarks that sometimes it generates wrong code and in many cases slower code too.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]