This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Problem with static constructor priorities on Darwin
- From: Alexander Potapenko <glider at google dot com>
- To: geoffk at geoffk dot org, rth at redhat dot com
- Cc: gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org, Jack Howarth <howarth at bromo dot med dot uc dot edu>
- Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2013 13:03:34 +0400
- Subject: Problem with static constructor priorities on Darwin
Hi Geoff, Richard et al.,
Looks like there's a problem with the support for static constructor
priorities when targeting Darwin.
This manifests under AddressSanitizer (gcc/asan.c), which inserts an
additional static constructor with priority equal to
MAX_RESERVED_INIT_PRIORITY-1 per each module - however the constructor
ends up being the last one in the __mod_init_func section, which leads
to crashes (see http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55617)
Looking at gcc/config/darwin.c I suspect that this is because
machopic_asm_out_constructor() just emits a pointer into
__mod_init_func for each constructor irrespective of its priority.
This might be fine if the constructors are created by a single
compiler pass (at least non-ASan builds behave correctly - maybe
someone else takes care of the priorities), but everything stops
working if another pass tries to add its own constructor.
As a proof of concept I've modified gcc/config/darwin.c to save the
constructors in machopic_asm_out_constructor() and emit them in
reversed order in darwin_file_end() (see
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29309&action=diff) -
this really changes the order of constructors and makes small ASan
tests pass, but this solution is far from a complete one.
Is my understanding of the current problem with
machopic_asm_out_constructor() correct? If so, any chance it can be
fixed?
Thanks,
Alexander Potapenko
Software Engineer
Google Moscow