gcc archive
date index for January, 2013

This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Indexes: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Site Nav: [Browse other archives for this mailing list]
[Browse other mailing lists at this site]
Search: Limit to:

January 31, 2013
22:59 Guia de Estados Financieros para Directores No Financieros Lic. Carolina Moo Aldana.
09:03 Problem with static constructor priorities on Darwin Alexander Potapenko

January 30, 2013
23:07 RFC: "firehose" : an interchange format (and code) for static code analysis results David Malcolm
22:17 Claves para Obtener Pagina Web Eficaz Lic. Areliz Massanges.
17:07 Re: problem inserting new function to cgraph Chassin
16:59 Re: System V Application Binary Interface 0.99.5 Andrew Haley
16:49 Re: System V Application Binary Interface 0.99.5 Michael Matz
16:37 Re: System V Application Binary Interface 0.99.5 Andrew Haley
15:55 Re: System V Application Binary Interface 0.99.5 Andrew Haley
15:52 Re: System V Application Binary Interface 0.99.5 Richard Biener
15:49 Re: System V Application Binary Interface 0.99.5 Andrew Haley
15:46 Re: System V Application Binary Interface 0.99.5 Richard Biener
15:06 Re: Copyright assignment forms David Edelsohn
15:01 Re: Copyright assignment forms Rainer Emrich
14:41 Re: RTL insns set differences Ian Lance Taylor
14:22 Re: System V Application Binary Interface 0.99.5 Andrew Haley
14:18 Re: System V Application Binary Interface 0.99.5 Michael Matz
11:22 System V Application Binary Interface 0.99.5 Andrew Haley
09:51 RTL insns set differences Umesh Kalappa

January 29, 2013
23:42 Como Usar Exitosamente la Red Linkedin Lic. Mario A. Garza.
20:43 Auditoria Interna y Funciones del Auditor Actual Lic. Isaias K. Molina.
12:53 Re: problem inserting new function to cgraph Martin Jambor
11:25 Re: problem inserting new function to cgraph Richard Biener
11:24 Re: gcc 4.7.3 plans? Richard Biener
08:46 Romantic evening albright
05:49 problem inserting new function to cgraph Chassin
03:09 gcc 4.7.3 plans? Kenny Simpson

January 28, 2013
23:03 Re: Loading Gimple from file Chassin
22:26 Re: Loading Gimple from file Ian Lance Taylor
21:51 Loading Gimple from file Chassin
20:53 Re: Bug repositories Ian Lance Taylor
20:49 Aspectos Criticos a Considerar de los Salarios Caidos Lic. Carolina Moo Aldana.
19:51 Re: Bug repositories Frédéric Buclin
19:24 Re: gcc : c++11 : full support : eta? Jason Merrill
17:32 Re: Bug repositories Ian Lance Taylor
15:47 Re: vec.h vs. --enable-gather-detailed-mem-stats Diego Novillo
14:48 Bug repositories Igor Kovacevic
12:19 Re: hard typdef - proposal - I know it's not in the standard Robert Dewar
11:50 Re: hard typdef - proposal - I know it's not in the standard Alec Teal
11:03 Re: Initial Stack Padding? Matt Davis
10:41 Re: hard typdef - proposal - I know it's not in the standard Jonathan Wakely
06:28 Re: hard typdef - proposal - I know it's not in the standard Alec Teal
06:19 Re: hard typdef - proposal - I know it's not in the standard Alec Teal
05:32 Re: Initial Stack Padding? Ian Lance Taylor
02:38 Re: hard typdef - proposal - I know it's not in the standard James Dennett
02:19 Re: hard typdef - proposal - I know it's not in the standard Alec Teal
02:11 Re: Floating Point subnormal numbers unde r C99 with GCC 4.7â Tim Prince
01:07 Re: About new project Hongtao Yu
01:02 Re: question about section 10.12 Kenneth Zadeck

January 27, 2013
23:02 Floating P oint subno rmal numbe rs under C 99 with GC C 4.7â Argentinator RincÃn MatemÃtico
22:53 gcc-4.8-20130127 is now available gccadmin
22:04 Re: About new project Gerald Pfeifer
12:10 vec.h vs. --enable-gather-detailed-mem-stats Steven Bosscher
11:41 Re: libgcc: soft float on mips-wrs-vxworks Jan Smets
07:12 Re: Imprecise data flow analysis leads to code bloat Georg-Johann Lay
03:00 Re: question about section 10.12 Hans-Peter Nilsson
01:44 Initial Stack Padding? Matt Davis

January 26, 2013
22:57 gcc-4.7-20130126 is now available gccadmin
19:28 About new project Hongtao Yu
15:38 Re: question about section 10.12 Marc Glisse
15:20 question about section 10.12 Kenneth Zadeck

January 25, 2013
22:55 gcc-4.6-20130125 is now available gccadmin
19:47 Re: A pass that worked in gcc-4.6.2 fails in gcc-4.7.2 Sudakshina Das
19:07 Re: Remove node from cgraph Chassin
18:16 Re: gcc : c++11 : full support : eta? Gabriel Dos Reis
17:54 Re: gcc : c++11 : full support : eta? Uday P. Khedker
16:08 RE: autovectorizer doesn't support multistep widen mult Paulo Matos
15:59 Re: autovectorizer doesn't support multistep widen mult Richard Biener
15:58 Re: A pass that worked in gcc-4.6.2 fails in gcc-4.7.2 Richard Biener
15:14 autovectorizer doesn't support multistep widen mult Paulo Matos
15:11 Re: Question on lower-subreg.c Ian Lance Taylor
14:58 Re: A pass that worked in gcc-4.6.2 fails in gcc-4.7.2 Sudakshina Das
14:33 Re: A pass that worked in gcc-4.6.2 fails in gcc-4.7.2 Richard Biener
14:21 Re: Remove node from cgraph Richard Biener
14:15 Re: Fully flow and context sensitive points-to analysis in GCC 4.6.0 Richard Biener
14:12 Re: mips16 and nomips16 Richard Sandiford
14:05 Re: A pass that worked in gcc-4.6.2 fails in gcc-4.7.2 Sudakshina Das
13:02 Re: mips16 and nomips16 Maciej W. Rozycki
12:43 Re: mips16 and nomips16 Maciej W. Rozycki
12:09 Re: gcc : c++11 : full support : eta? Paolo Bonzini
11:47 Re: Bootstrapping glibc vs. dependency on system headers Thomas Schwinge
11:39 Re: Bootstrapping glibc vs. dependency on system headers Thomas Schwinge
08:38 Re: Question on lower-subreg.c Bin.Cheng
08:03 Re: Remove node from cgraph Chassin
07:58 Question on lower-subreg.c Bin.Cheng
07:24 Re: gcc : c++11 : full support : eta? Uday P. Khedker
07:17 Re: Long term viability of GCC (was Re: gcc : c++11 : full support : eta?) Uday P. Khedker
06:01 Re: gcc : c++11 : full support : eta? Basile Starynkevitch
04:17 Re: A pass that worked in gcc-4.6.2 fails in gcc-4.7.2 Sudakshina Das
03:36 Offset from frame pointer question Matt Davis

January 24, 2013
21:32 Re: gcc : c++11 : full support : eta? Alec Teal
21:28 Re: gcc : c++11 : full support : eta? Alec Teal
21:01 Re: gcc : c++11 : full support : eta? Toon Moene
20:32 Re: hard typdef - proposal - I know it's not in the standard Marc Glisse
20:18 Re: gcc : c++11 : full support : eta? Diego Novillo
20:17 Re: gcc : c++11 : full support : eta? Basile Starynkevitch
20:12 Re: gcc : c++11 : full support : eta? Alec Teal
19:59 Re: gcc : c++11 : full support : eta? Jeff Law
19:56 Re: hard typdef - proposal - I know it's not in the standard Alec Teal
19:55 Re: gcc : c++11 : full support : eta? Diego Novillo
19:49 Re: hard typdef - proposal - I know it's not in the standard Jeffrey Walton
19:45 Re: hard typdef - proposal - I know it's not in the standard Lawrence Crowl
19:23 Re: hard typdef - proposal - I know it's not in the standard Alec Teal
18:45 Re: hard typdef - proposal - I know it's not in the standard Jonathan Wakely
18:45 Re: Long term viability of GCC (was Re: gcc : c++11 : full support : eta?) David Malcolm
18:08 Re: gcc : c++11 : full support : eta? Jeff Law
17:23 Re: gcc : c++11 : full support : eta? Alexandre Oliva
17:18 Re: Fully flow and context sensitive points-to analysis in GCC 4.6.0 Uday P. Khedker
17:11 Re: GCC Cauldron: Notes from the C++ ABI BOF Jason Merrill
17:02 Re: gcc : c++11 : full support : eta? Uday P. Khedker
16:39 Re: [Announce] New gcc 4.7 vtable security branch in GCC repository. Caroline Tice
16:35 [Announce] New gcc 4.7 vtable security branch in GCC repository. Caroline Tice
16:25 Re: Integer Overflow/Wrap and GCC Optimizations Robert Dewar
16:21 Re: hard typdef - proposal - I know it's not in the standard Alec Teal
16:04 Re: Integer Overflow/Wrap and GCC Optimizations Florian Weimer
15:41 Re: Integer Overflow/Wrap and GCC Optimizations Andrew Haley
15:36 cgraph instrumentation Chassin
15:35 cgraph instrumentation Chassin
15:33 Re: Integer Overflow/Wrap and GCC Optimizations Jeffrey Walton
15:13 Re: Integer Overflow/Wrap and GCC Optimizations Marc Glisse
15:07 Re: Integer Overflow/Wrap and GCC Optimizations Robert Dewar
15:02 Integer Overflow/Wrap and GCC Optimizations Jeffrey Walton
14:23 Re: hard typdef - proposal - I know it's not in the standard Robert Dewar
14:11 Re: hard typdef - proposal - I know it's not in the standard Alec Teal
13:25 Re: gcc : c++11 : full support : eta? NightStrike
12:30 Re: gcc : c++11 : full support : eta? Uday Khedker
12:08 Re: gcc : c++11 : full support : eta? Richard Biener
11:59 Re: Fully flow and context sensitive points-to analysis in GCC 4.6.0 Richard Biener
11:45 Re: A pass that worked in gcc-4.6.2 fails in gcc-4.7.2 Richard Biener
09:59 Re: gcc : c++11 : full support : eta? Kartik Singhal
09:47 Re: gcc : c++11 : full support : eta? Andrew Haley
09:40 Re: gcc : c++11 : full support : eta? Uday Khedker
09:29 Re: Long term viability of GCC (was Re: gcc : c++11 : full support : eta?) Andrew Haley
09:25 Re: Fully flow and context sensitive points-to analysis in GCC 4.6.0 Uday P. Khedker
09:14 Re: gcc : c++11 : full support : eta? Alec Teal
09:07 Re: gcc : c++11 : full support : eta? Kartik Singhal
06:06 A pass that worked in gcc-4.6.2 fails in gcc-4.7.2 Sudakshina Das
03:49 Re: hard typdef - proposal - I know it's not in the standard Alec Teal

January 23, 2013
23:45 GCC Plugin Announcement; CTraps - Lightweight dynamic analysis for concurrent code Brandon Lucia
23:07 Re: hard typdef - proposal - I know it's not in the standard Lawrence Crowl
22:34 Re: Bootstrapping glibc vs. dependency on system headers Roland McGrath
21:02 Re: gcc : c++11 : full support : eta? Diego Novillo
20:39 Re: gcc : c++11 : full support : eta? Uday Khedker
20:32 Re: gcc : c++11 : full support : eta? David Edelsohn
20:27 Re: Fully flow and context sensitive points-to analysis in GCC 4.6.0 Richard Biener
20:17 Re: Fully flow and context sensitive points-to analysis in GCC 4.6.0 Uday Khedker
20:00 Re: Long term viability of GCC (was Re: gcc : c++11 : full support : eta?) Alec Teal
19:58 Re: Long term viability of GCC (was Re: gcc : c++11 : full support : eta?) Richard Biener
19:55 Re: gcc : c++11 : full support : eta? Alec Teal
19:43 Re: gcc : c++11 : full support : eta? David Edelsohn
19:43 Re: gcc : c++11 : full support : eta? Richard Biener
19:38 Long term viability of GCC (was Re: gcc : c++11 : full support : eta?) Diego Novillo
19:37 Re: Remove node from cgraph Richard Biener
19:24 Re: gcc : c++11 : full support : eta? Alec Teal
19:18 Re: gcc : c++11 : full support : eta? Uday Khedker
19:16 Re: gcc : c++11 : full support : eta? Alec Teal
19:10 Re: gcc : c++11 : full support : eta? Diego Novillo
19:05 Re: gcc : c++11 : full support : eta? Richard Biener
18:55 Re: gcc : c++11 : full support : eta? Uday Khedker
16:49 Re: gcc : c++11 : full support : eta? Dodji Seketeli
15:55 Re: Remove node from cgraph Richard Biener
14:38 Re: gcc : c++11 : full support : eta? Aldy Hernandez
12:14 Re: gcc : c++11 : full support : eta? Diego Novillo
11:07 Re: gcc : c++11 : full support : eta? Richard Kenner
10:37 Re: gcc : c++11 : full support : eta? Alec Teal
10:31 Better debugging with! Alec Teal
10:26 Re: gcc : c++11 : full support : eta? Richard Kenner
09:56 Re: Compiling GCC problems Martin Jambor
09:43 Re: hard typdef - proposal - I know it's not in the standard Jonathan Wakely
09:16 Re: hard typdef - proposal - I know it's not in the standard Alec Teal
09:14 Re: Compiling GCC problems Jonathan Wakely
09:04 Re: gcc : c++11 : full support : eta? Jonathan Wakely
08:55 Re: hard typdef - proposal - I know it's not in the standard Jonathan Wakely
08:38 Re: libatomic multilib testing Andreas Schwab
08:26 Re: Compiling GCC problems Alec Teal
08:19 Re: Compiling GCC problems Alec Teal
08:17 Compiling GCC problems Alec Teal
07:56 Re: gcc : c++11 : full support : eta? Richard Biener
07:52 Re: gcc : c++11 : full support : eta? Alec Teal
07:50 Re: gcc : c++11 : full support : eta? Uday Khedker
07:42 Re: gcc : c++11 : full support : eta? Alec Teal
07:28 Re: gcc : c++11 : full support : eta? Uday Khedker
07:08 Re: hard typdef - proposal - I know it's not in the standard Basile Starynkevitch
06:53 hard typdef - proposal - I know it's not in the standard Alec Teal
06:49 Re: gcc : c++11 : full support : eta? Franz Fehringer
01:56 Re: gcc : c++11 : full support : eta? Richard Kenner
01:12 RE: Caller save mode on MIPS Fu, Chao-Ying
00:42 Re: GCC Cauldron: Notes from the C++ ABI BOF Cary Coutant

January 22, 2013
22:25 libatomic multilib testing Steve Ellcey
21:35 Re: gcc : c++11 : full support : eta? Georg-Johann Lay
19:54 Re: gcc : c++11 : full support : eta? Jonathan Wakely
19:14 Re: gcc : c++11 : full support : eta? Alec Teal
18:53 Re: gcc : c++11 : full support : eta? Andrew Haley
18:24 Re: gcc : c++11 : full support : eta? Richard Kenner
18:16 Re: gcc : c++11 : full support : eta? Andrew Haley
18:14 Re: gcc : c++11 : full support : eta? Jonathan Wakely
18:12 Re: gcc : c++11 : full support : eta? Jonathan Wakely
18:07 Re: GCC Cauldron: Notes from the C++ ABI BOF Jason Merrill
18:03 Re: gcc : c++11 : full support : eta? Alec Teal
18:02 Re: gcc : c++11 : full support : eta? Jason Merrill
17:51 Re: gcc : c++11 : full support : eta? Alec Teal
17:47 Re: gcc : c++11 : full support : eta? Jonathan Wakely
17:40 Re: gcc : c++11 : full support : eta? Jonathan Wakely
17:35 Re: gcc : c++11 : full support : eta? Alec Teal
17:31 Re: gcc : c++11 : full support : eta? Alec Teal
17:24 Re: gcc : c++11 : full support : eta? Jonathan Wakely
17:12 Re: gcc : c++11 : full support : eta? Alec Teal
17:03 Re: gcc : c++11 : full support : eta? Alec Teal
17:00 Re: gcc : c++11 : full support : eta? Jonathan Wakely
16:58 Re: gcc : c++11 : full support : eta? Diego Novillo
16:58 Re: gcc : c++11 : full support : eta? Richard Kenner
16:53 Re: gcc : c++11 : full support : eta? NightStrike
14:48 Re: gcc : c++11 : full support : eta? Andrew Haley
14:42 Re: gcc : c++11 : full support : eta? Robert Dewar
14:29 Re: gcc : c++11 : full support : eta? Alec Teal
14:21 Re: gcc : c++11 : full support : eta? Andrew Haley
12:55 Re: gcc : c++11 : full support : eta? Alec Teal
09:01 Re: gcc : c++11 : full support : eta? Andrew Haley
06:01 gcc : c++11 : full support : eta? Mayuresh Kathe

January 21, 2013
20:12 GNU Tools Cauldron 2013 - 2nd Call for Abstracts Diego Novillo
05:36 Remove node from cgraph Chassin

January 20, 2013
22:58 gcc-4.8-20130120 is now available gccadmin
00:47 Re: GCC cannot move address calculation to store+load? Xinliang David Li

January 19, 2013
22:57 gcc-4.7-20130119 is now available gccadmin
20:36 Re: gcc 4.7 regression on bool function specialization Jonathan Wakely
18:58 gcc 4.7 regression on bool function specialization Jason A. Donenfeld
10:13 Re: make check stops after one case in asan.exp Bin.Cheng
09:53 Re: make check stops after one case in asan.exp Andreas Schwab
09:23 make check stops after one case in asan.exp Bin.Cheng

January 18, 2013
23:45 gcc-4.6-20130118 is now available gccadmin
18:04 Pipe Line Chassin
17:33 Re: Adding Rounding Mode to Operations Opcodes in Gimple and RTL Joseph S. Myers
15:58 Re: GCC cannot move address calculation to store+load? Miles Bader
12:58 Re: Caller save mode on MIPS Richard Sandiford
12:56 Re: Adding Rounding Mode to Operations Opcodes in Gimple and RTL Michael Zolotukhin
12:46 Re: mips16 and nomips16 Richard Sandiford
11:48 Re: Imprecise data flow analysis leads to code bloat Georg-Johann Lay
10:37 Re: Bootstrapping glibc vs. dependency on system headers Thomas Schwinge
10:17 Re: Graphite TODO tasks Shakthi Kannan
10:02 Re: GCC cannot move address calculation to store+load? Richard Biener
09:56 Re: Graphite TODO tasks Richard Biener
09:44 Re: Bootstrapping glibc vs. dependency on system headers Thomas Schwinge
09:39 Re: Imprecise data flow analysis leads to code bloat Richard Biener
08:32 GCC cannot move address calculation to store+load? Konstantin Vladimirov
07:28 Re: Graphite TODO tasks Shakthi Kannan
05:57 Re: microblaze unroll loops optimization David Holsgrove

January 17, 2013
18:50 Re: Components no longer exist Mischa Baars
18:40 Re: Components no longer exist Jonathan Wakely
17:49 Re: Components no longer exist Mischa Baars
17:47 Re: missing optimization "a << (b & 63) to a << b" Xinliang David Li
17:33 Re: Components no longer exist Jonathan Wakely
17:31 Re: Components no longer exist Jonathan Wakely
17:29 Re: Components no longer exist Mischa Baars
17:23 Re: Components no longer exist Jonathan Wakely
17:18 Re: Bootstrapping glibc vs. dependency on system headers Joseph S. Myers
17:16 Re: Primary and secondary sysroot? Dmitry Mikushin
17:10 Bootstrapping glibc vs. dependency on system headers Thomas Schwinge
17:04 Re: Imprecise data flow analysis leads to code bloat Georg-Johann Lay
16:54 Re: Adding Rounding Mode to Operations Opcodes in Gimple and RTL Joseph S. Myers
16:47 Re: Identical basic blocks live long in RTL flow. Jeff Law
16:34 Re: Components no longer exist Mischa Baars
16:28 Re: Components no longer exist Mischa Baars
16:18 Re: not-a-number's Mischa Baars
15:49 Components no longer exist Michael Witten
15:46 Re: not-a-number's Vincent Lefevre
15:39 Re: not-a-number's Mischa Baars
15:39 Re: not-a-number's Vincent Lefevre
15:34 Re: not-a-number's Mischa Baars
14:01 Re: not-a-number's Andreas Schwab
13:43 Re: not-a-number's Andreas Schwab
13:16 Re: not-a-number's Vincent Lefevre
12:24 Re: Graphite TODO tasks Richard Biener
12:21 Re: Graphite TODO tasks Shakthi Kannan
12:08 Re: not-a-number's Gabriel Paubert
11:39 Re: Imprecise data flow analysis leads to code bloat Richard Biener
11:25 Re: not-a-number's Vincent Lefevre
11:21 Re: not-a-number's Vincent Lefevre
11:20 Imprecise data flow analysis leads to code bloat Georg-Johann Lay
10:40 Re: Identical basic blocks live long in RTL flow. Bin.Cheng
10:09 Re: missing optimization "a << (b & 63) to a << b" Richard Biener
05:57 Re: not-a-number's Mischa Baars
05:53 Re: not-a-number's Mischa Baars
03:19 Re: missing optimization "a << (b & 63) to a << b" Xinliang David Li
01:44 missing optimization "a << (b & 63) to a << b" Wei Mi

January 16, 2013
21:40 Caller save mode on MIPS Fu, Chao-Ying
19:42 Re: isl-0.10 and cloog-0.17.0 removed from ftp server Richard Biener
18:36 isl-0.10 and cloog-0.17.0 removed from ftp server Mike Stump
18:23 Re: not-a-number's David Paterson
17:29 Re: Identical basic blocks live long in RTL flow. Jan Hubicka
17:10 Re: Identical basic blocks live long in RTL flow. Jeff Law
16:15 Re: not-a-number's Vincent Lefevre
15:56 Re: not-a-number's Ian Lance Taylor
15:54 Re: not-a-number's Vincent Lefevre
14:39 Re: not-a-number's Andreas Schwab
14:18 Re: not-a-number's Tim Prince
13:53 Re: not-a-number's Richard Biener
13:27 Re: not-a-number's Andrew Haley
12:52 Re: not-a-number's Mischa Baars
12:29 Re: not-a-number's Robert Dewar
12:12 Re: not-a-number's Mischa Baars
12:05 Re: not-a-number's Robert Dewar
11:55 Re: not-a-number's Mischa Baars
11:47 Re: not-a-number's Mischa Baars
11:07 Re: not-a-number's Andrew Haley
09:29 Identical basic blocks live long in RTL flow. Bin.Cheng
09:27 Re: not-a-number's Mischa Baars
09:10 Re: not-a-number's Jonathan Wakely
09:06 Re: not-a-number's Andreas Schwab
09:00 Re: not-a-number's Mischa Baars
08:51 Re: not-a-number's Mischa Baars
08:15 Re: not-a-number's Andreas Schwab
07:58 Re: not-a-number's Eric Botcazou
07:15 Re: Stellaris Non-Word-Aligned Write to SRAM Erratum Ye Joey
06:59 Re: not-a-number's Mischa Baars
06:51 Re: not-a-number's Mischa Baars

January 15, 2013
23:27 Re: stabs/dwarf size comparison on CSiBE (Was: stabs support in binutils, gcc, and gdb) Steven Bosscher
20:58 Re: microblaze unroll loops optimization Richard Henderson
17:53 Re: stabs/dwarf size comparison on CSiBE (Was: stabs support in binutils, gcc, and gdb) Jan Kratochvil
16:25 Re: not-a-number's Eric Botcazou
16:07 not-a-number's Mischa Baars
13:15 Re: bug report: not-a-number not recognized when compiling for x86_64 Mischa Baars
10:12 Re: stabs/dwarf size comparison on CSiBE (Was: stabs support in binutils, gcc, and gdb) Steven Bosscher
10:10 stabs/dwarf size comparison on CSiBE (Was: stabs support in binutils, gcc, and gdb) Steven Bosscher
09:51 Re: Building GCC using C++ Tobias Burnus
09:34 Re: Building GCC using C++ Richard Biener
08:58 Re: Building GCC using C++ Basile Starynkevitch
06:08 Re: Building GCC using C++ Uday P. Khedker
06:04 Re: Building GCC using C++ Basile Starynkevitch
05:47 Building GCC using C++ Uday P. Khedker
00:53 Re: mips16 and nomips16 reed kotler
00:50 Re: mips16 and nomips16 David Daney
00:32 mips16 and nomips16 reed kotler

January 14, 2013
23:41 Re: stabs support in binutils, gcc, and gdb Eric Botcazou
22:18 Re: stabs support in binutils, gcc, and gdb Andreas Schwab
21:32 Re: register indirect addressing for global variables on powerpc David Edelsohn
19:49 Re: stabs support in binutils, gcc, and gdb Jan Kratochvil
19:45 Re: stabs support in binutils, gcc, and gdb Cary Coutant
18:56 Re: stabs support in binutils, gcc, and gdb David Taylor
18:48 Re: register indirect addressing for global variables on powerpc Peter Bergner
18:09 Re: register indirect addressing for global variables on powerpc Andrew Pinski
18:04 Re: register indirect addressing for global variables on powerpc Eric Botcazou
16:59 Re: register indirect addressing for global variables on powerpc Andrew Pinski
16:12 Re: stabs support in binutils, gcc, and gdb Doug Evans
16:07 Re: Graphite TODO tasks Tobias Grosser
16:06 Re: stabs support in binutils, gcc, and gdb Doug Evans
14:51 Re: bug report: not-a-number not recognized when compiling for x86_64 Marc Glisse
14:50 Re: bug report: not-a-number not recognized when compiling for x86_64 Andrew Haley
14:50 Re: bug report: not-a-number not recognized when compiling for x86_64 Richard Biener
14:46 register indirect addressing for global variables on powerpc Thomas Baier
14:43 bug report: not-a-number not recognized when compiling for x86_64 Mischa Baars
14:42 Re: Adding Rounding Mode to Operations Opcodes in Gimple and RTL Richard Biener

January 13, 2013
23:06 gcc-4.8-20130113 is now available gccadmin

January 12, 2013
22:55 gcc-4.7-20130112 is now available gccadmin
13:26 Re: stabs support in binutils, gcc, and gdb Andreas Schwab
03:21 Re: microblaze unroll loops optimization Michael Eager
02:54 Re: microblaze unroll loops optimization David Holsgrove
02:17 Re: stabs support in binutils, gcc, and gdb Ian Lance Taylor
01:55 Re: stabs support in binutils, gcc, and gdb Cary Coutant

January 11, 2013
23:04 gcc-4.6-20130111 is now available gccadmin
17:41 Re: stabs support in binutils, gcc, and gdb Doug Evans
17:39 Fwd: Your NY Photos Angelina Pierce
16:41 Re: Adding Rounding Mode to Operations Opcodes in Gimple and RTL Joseph S. Myers
14:53 Re: stabs support in binutils, gcc, and gdb David Taylor
13:29 Re: Adding Rounding Mode to Operations Opcodes in Gimple and RTL Michael Zolotukhin
12:51 Re: cloog/isl version update for gcc 4.8 Richard Biener
01:59 Re: GCC Cauldron: Notes from the C++ ABI BOF Cary Coutant

January 10, 2013
19:59 Re: Query regarding atomic builtins Ian Lance Taylor
18:38 Query regarding atomic builtins Prasad Joshi
18:29 Stellaris Non-Word-Aligned Write to SRAM Erratum Louis-Philippe Brais
18:04 Re: Adding Rounding Mode to Operations Opcodes in Gimple and RTL Joseph S. Myers
15:31 Synopsys DesignWare ARC Port David Edelsohn
10:15 Re: ICE: in bitmap_set_replace_value Richard Biener
08:43 ICE: in bitmap_set_replace_value thorsten
08:28 Re: Adding Rounding Mode to Operations Opcodes in Gimple and RTL Michael Zolotukhin
01:06 lm32 unknown exception model (side-effect of libgcc reorg) Joel Sherrill

January 09, 2013
19:28 Re: libada configure contains wrong code and GNAT as a cross compiler in general Eric Botcazou
18:11 Re: libada configure contains wrong code and GNAT as a cross compiler in general Luke A. Guest
16:52 Re: optimize malloc to stack allocation. Richard Biener
16:51 Re: libada configure contains wrong code and GNAT as a cross compiler in general Luke A. Guest
16:39 Re: optimize malloc to stack allocation. OndÅej BÃlka
16:12 Re: optimize malloc to stack allocation. Marc Glisse
16:04 optimize malloc to stack allocation. OndÅej BÃlka
09:40 Re: libada configure contains wrong code and GNAT as a cross compiler in general Eric Botcazou
08:57 Re: libada configure contains wrong code and GNAT as a cross compiler in general Arnaud Charlet
08:45 libada configure contains wrong code and GNAT as a cross compiler in general Luke A. Guest
03:17 Re: Missed ssa-copyrename optimization? Bin.Cheng
02:35 RE: Build error in genconstants.c Iyer, Balaji V

January 08, 2013
23:20 RE: Build error in genconstants.c Marc Glisse
18:16 RE: Build error in genconstants.c Iyer, Balaji V
14:58 Re: stabs support in binutils, gcc, and gdb Arnaud Charlet
14:49 Re: stabs support in binutils, gcc, and gdb David Edelsohn
14:46 Re: stabs support in binutils, gcc, and gdb Arnaud Charlet
14:38 Re: stabs support in binutils, gcc, and gdb David Edelsohn
12:08 GCC 4.8.0 Status Report (2013-01-08), Stage 3 is over, regression fixes and docs only in effect immediately Richard Biener
10:42 Re: Missed ssa-copyrename optimization? Richard Biener
08:48 edges, plugins, and why they need a GC.... Basile Starynkevitch
08:10 Re: stabs support in binutils, gcc, and gdb Joel Brobecker
07:52 Missed ssa-copyrename optimization? Bin.Cheng
07:38 Re: Primary and secondary sysroot? Ian Lance Taylor
06:31 Re: Build error in genconstants.c Marc Glisse
05:59 microblaze unroll loops optimization David Holsgrove
00:14 Build error in genconstants.c Iyer, Balaji V

January 07, 2013
19:12 Re: code hoisting with CCmode condition codes Richard Henderson
16:11 Re: VUSE ops on return statements that return a GIMPLE reg? Richard Biener
15:40 VUSE ops on return statements that return a GIMPLE reg? Steven Bosscher
12:20 Re: PR 55171 4.6 Backport Kai Tietz
12:14 PR 55171 4.6 Backport Jonathan Liu
10:47 Primary and secondary sysroot? Dmitry Mikushin
08:59 Too conservative in hardreg propagation pass? Bin.Cheng
07:57 Re: question on "undefined reference to _gcov_init" Nathan Sidwell
07:45 Re: Copyright assignment forms Maxim Kuvyrkov

January 06, 2013
22:59 gcc-4.8-20130106 is now available gccadmin
21:11 code hoisting with CCmode condition codes Alan Lehotsky
17:04 Re: Align a POD srtuct on the stack (aliasing issue with gcc 4.6+) H.J. Lu
12:45 Re: Align a POD srtuct on the stack (alia sing issue with gcc 4.6+)â Larry Evans
11:37 Re: Align a POD srtuct on the stack (aliasing issue with gcc 4.6+) Richard Biener
10:26 Re: Suspicious missing tail call opportunity Andrew Pinski
09:28 Suspicious missing tail call opportunity Ye Joey
07:00 Re: stabs support in binutils, gcc, and gdb Joel Brobecker
03:03 RE: Align a POD srtu ct on the stack (ali asing issu e with gcc 4.6+)‏ pps .
03:00 Align a PO D srtuct o n the stac k (aliasin g issue wi th gcc 4.6 +)‏ pps .
00:26 Re: stabs support in binutils, gcc, and gdb David Edelsohn

January 05, 2013
22:56 gcc-4.7-20130105 is now available gccadmin
14:52 Re: stabs support in binutils, gcc, and gdb Joel Brobecker
13:28 Re: stabs support in binutils, gcc, and gdb David Edelsohn
07:53 Re: stabs support in binutils, gcc, and gdb Joel Brobecker
02:26 Re: error: invalid use of void expression Eric Blake
00:47 error: invalid use of void expression Bruce Korb
00:11 Re: stabs support in binutils, gcc, and gdb David Edelsohn

January 04, 2013
23:01 gcc-4.6-20130104 is now available gccadmin
20:20 Re: stabs support in binutils, gcc, and gdb David Edelsohn
19:19 Re: contrib/test_summary mail error Andreas Schwab
18:09 Re: contrib/test_summary mail error Joel Sherrill
15:34 Re: contrib/test_summary mail error Toon Moene
15:14 contrib/test_summary mail error Cynthia Rempel
06:02 Re: Re: Re: Query for Empty Structure Extension. NAVEEN CHANDRAKAR
04:12 Re: stabs support in binutils, gcc, and gdb Joel Brobecker
03:31 Re: stabs support in binutils, gcc, and gdb Doug Evans

January 03, 2013
22:01 Re: stabs support in binutils, gcc, and gdb David Edelsohn
21:53 Re: stabs support in binutils, gcc, and gdb Jonas Maebe
20:53 Re: stabs support in binutils, gcc, and gdb David Edelsohn
20:51 Re: Control dependence vs. builtin_unreachable Jeff Law
19:35 Re: Re: Query for Empty Structure Extension. NAVEEN CHANDRAKAR
19:02 Control dependence vs. builtin_unreachable Steven Bosscher
17:02 Re: stabs support in binutils, gcc, and gdb Tom Tromey
16:56 Re: stabs support in binutils, gcc, and gdb nick clifton
16:53 Re: stabs support in binutils, gcc, and gdb Joel Brobecker
16:42 Re: stabs support in binutils, gcc, and gdb Richard Biener
16:22 stabs support in binutils, gcc, and gdb David Taylor
16:14 Re: Fwd: Updating copyright dates automatically Joseph S. Myers
11:54 Copyright assignment forms Rainer Emrich
10:56 Re: a hello, and a few gcc v4+ implementation questions James Dennett
10:50 a hello, and a few gcc v4+ implementation questions Mayuresh Kathe
05:14 Re: pre-compiled versions of GCC for hp-ux Gerald Pfeifer

January 02, 2013
19:57 POWER architecture transaction memory documentation David Edelsohn
17:31 Re: Fwd: Updating copyright dates automatically Robert Dewar
17:26 Fwd: Updating copyright dates automatically Jeff Law
15:33 Re: Graphite TODO tasks Richard Biener
15:17 Re: Query for Empty Structure Extension. Jonathan Wakely
15:14 Re: Graphite TODO tasks Jack Howarth
15:07 Re: [patch][RFC] bail out after front-end errors Richard Biener
14:32 Query for Empty Structure Extension. NAVEEN CHANDRAKAR
01:58 Re: Deprecate i386 for GCC 4.8? H. Peter Anvin

January 01, 2013
10:48 Re: Graphite TODO tasks Basile Starynkevitch
09:53 Graphite TODO tasks Shakthi Kannan


Indexes: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Site Nav: [Browse other archives for this mailing list]
[Browse other mailing lists at this site]
Search: Limit to:

Mail converted by MHonArc 2.6.3